oh, gun talk isn't banned yet?

how lovely

gun, guns, gun, guns guns

there

I talked about guns

oh, it looks like a gun

uh huh

a gun

that's an old one

a gun, that is

yup

a good ol ,... gun

wow

very old

you have that?

wdym it can shoot twice?

oh

so you do it once for 2 bullets?

Oh

sounds like more than double action lol

idk

but that would make it a semi automatic

no?

yeah, that , I udnesrstand

the single action one

oh

i SEE

ok

so, you have to do 2 motions to make the other gun shoot

and the double, you have to do 1

where u live?

oh, me too

ok, well, some people like the leaf

lol

so are alot of things NOW thanks to Turdeau

I spelt his name wrong on purpose

wait- are you at least 16?

well, not exactly

you can use reasonable force in self defence

yes, and a reasonable judge will be fine

if you kill a guy who is unarmed, yeah- that is excessive

if you dont try and get away first, that could be an issue

hmm

he may have been arrrested and then let go- cuz they needed to find out what happened

first

he would not have been charged

successfully

what province

🙂

k

Generally, Canadian law gives residents a wide latitude to legally use violence to defend their home.

no the case, which province

criminal code= violence is entirely legal if someone has “reasonable grounds” to believe that the “threat of force is being made against them or another person.”

If you’re defending yourself against a violent attack and there is no other way to escape death or serious injury, then you can use an unlimited amount of violence to stop it

but it depends on each circumstance

also.....

Canada even has a de facto “stand your ground” law. Nobody in Canada has an obligation to retreat when their home is involved. If an intruder comes through the front door with an axe, no judge will ever question why a homeowner didn’t simply escape out the back door.

it doesnt mention if the yhad weapons, does it?

OH
i know why

They were unarmed and FLEEING the property when he shot them

thats DIff!

Guerin was charged with criminal negligence, but less than a year later, a jury let the shopkeeper walk free.

He walked away

so...

even that was allwoed

it is dumb

did you see the conclusion tho?

Guerin was charged with criminal negligence, but less than a year later, a jury let the shopkeeper walk free.

teh guy

who was charged

Oh wait

thats another guy

sorry

the other case doesn't mention if they were unarmed..

ugh

this is old, it should have had an ending by now

True

Murder charge dropped against Gilbert Budgell

the charges were dropped a year later tho

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/murder-charge-gilbert-budgell-dropped-1.4351371

ok

again, reasonable force for the type of situation you are in

those guys have a family as well, but yeah- if the yhave aweapon- all bets are off

No, they can be charged with simply , owning an illegal firearm

that's it

and that probably would be the case

maybe negligence...but it depends on the situation

ok then

what i said before

It is gonna get worse, i fear (the restriction of guns)

they prob go for the rest of semi-automatics- what is left of them

but they fail to see that having only military and police with weapons is a danger to society

Of course the Elite and Gov like it, cuz the yare in control

you have to have a VERY Specific licence