gravity is a thing<:lul:484994724118134784>

it does when it draws in gases to form an atmosphere

yes, and what is keeping the gases on earth?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQS6sb3xXAM

already showed you an example

shifting the goal post again i see

lmao no you're not

you have zero evidence of a dome

also yes, gravity is still a thing that the earth has that lets it retain an atmosphere

it doesn;t, it's another way that atmospheric pressure is retained

You haven't posted a single thing supporting there being a dome

if the rockets hit the dome they would have been destroyed

also if the sun were over a flat earth you would never see it disappear below the horizon

thats not I was saying

i was saying you would see *the rockets* be destroyed

and besides, if there was a dome then a meteor would not be able to impact earth

which happened

the first rocket does not get destroyed at all

and if a rocket were to "scrap" along the dome it wouldnt release *water*

wow that meme is an especially dumb one

that's not what I'm saying

I'm talking about damage *to the rockets*

tell me, if a metal thing scraps along a surface harder than itself, what happens?

when a metal thing hits something harder than itself, *it will not create water vapor*

gravity<:lul:484994724118134784>

those "real stars" show what happen when you try to look at stars with a camera

Just get a telescope <:lul:484994724118134784> <:lul:484994724118134784> <:lul:484994724118134784>

atmospheric distortion *is* a thing lmfao

LMFAO

^

all you have to do is use a telescope and focus the image

on a camera

that isn;t purpose built for viewing objects beyond the atmosphere

a p900 is a camera not a telescope

that's not the same as an *actual telescope*

no it isn't, I've used a damn telescope before and the images look significantly clearer

yeah wow, lmao

because you can;t be bothered to test this yourself, i take it?

you did not provide evidence

and besides it's daytime and i don;t give that much of a care about this

you're on a flat earther server, dude. calling someone else stupid is out the window

I don;t understand how this is beyond you

use a telescope and you get clearer images

a telescopic mount on a camera is not the same as an actual telescope since *all that does is increase the size of the image on a camera and does not have nearly as much resolving power*

good lord

there you go

telescope

not a camera

keep being in denial

you seem to be completely foreign to the concept that telescopes are entirely purpose built for viewing objects beyond the atmosphere, while a camera (even with a telescopic attatchment) is not

who would have thought one would be better

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4303376

you can put a camera on the lens of a telescope, genius

read the post

*link

*they are not synonyms*

stop with the gotcha! moments and *read* what i am saying

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4303376 read the damn link, then get back to me

its good for viewing the moon but not farther objects like planets or stars

it doesn't have nearly as much resolving power as a bigger, dedicated telescope

now that i can get behind

not if it's the government encroaching on people's rights

how are they cia shills?

lmao

lmfao

yeah pizzagate is a troubling thing

interesting graph

that does not prove a flat earth, even if there was actual evidence for such

yep, that's the response I've usually seen

wow

There is more to pizzagate than that, there were arrests of over 400 pedophiles and numerous emails that seemed to be referring to using children for acts

no evidence for it though, apparently

yeah a globe thousands of miles wide is going to feel flat to you, but you can tell that objects disappear over the horizon line for instance

which can't happen on a flat plane

so you've never seen the sun go below the horizon line?

not sure

wow

based on that model you would still see the sun at any point on the world

night is still literally impossible there

accoridng to them it spirals above the flat earth

how? no idea

apparently stellar luminosity isnt a thing either in flat earth...

how do you explain the 2013 Chelyabinsk meteor?

just curious

but it impacted the ground

as a hard object

there's photographs

by your own logic you shouldn't believe in this since you're citing them only using paintings and cgi allegedly

completely hypocritical

you haven't shown any images of the flat earth in a way that would actually convey that it is indeed clearly flat and with a firmament

You have to tread lightly here

They'll just post Antarctic glacier pics now

Yep

Not really a "wall", is it?

Because it's not a wall, it looks more like a landmass<:lul:484994724118134784>

Evidence

hell

well that's ironically contradictory

but no one here can seem to prove that FE is reality

we're way past that