shlomar
Discord ID: 258948386353446922
14 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1
Thanks
When there's a movie that insults god I like to watch it censored so my feelings aren't hurt and so my faith isn't shaken
i can't tell if you're a troll or for real
hey dude
@Doctor Anon you said sexist things. Denying your sexism is the last thing that'll help your argument; embrace your sexism.
As for your statics, sources, and history of women's happiness, it's better to leave that to women to decide. I wouldn't be happy either if I lived in an era where I actually learn to stand up for myself, demand my rights as a woman and a human being, and instead of being seen as a man's equal, I deal with this much sexism, and with people with your mindset.
smh
By "happiness" do you mean breed a sex that does all the work and another sex that serves the sex of the workers?
lmfao k
They shouldn't have to.
Attractiveness was irrelevant to the argument of women's happiness and being below men, fyi.
"A happy society is a strong one."
The Saudi Arabian society is one where women were only recently allowed to drive, can't be seen with revealing clothes in public, are normally forced to marry someone they don't want to marry, and literally need a male's approval (usually a relative's or a husband's) to do things normal people should be allowed to do. It's a society where women are very much below men.
Does it seem like a fucking happy society to you? Are women there fucking happy in your opinion? Is it a strong fucking society?
@Doctor Anon "Facts."
You should stop being this arrogant.
Yes, women can be happy staying at home, not worrying about work, waking up whenever, doing nothing but cooking; cleaning; talking to friends; raising children; living a simple life with no dreams or achievements or things to be proud of, but it doesn't mean that every woman, or even the majority of women are or will be happy if they stay at home. It's the case for your community, but you can't prove that it is for everyone else. Women used to be below men, unable to vote, and unable to do anything worth mentioning, and if they want to, they still can; society doesn't frown upon housewives, and it's best for them to experiment and see if working makes them happier or if staying at home does, just like men can.
@Doctor Anon http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/stay-at-home-dads-wives-earn-money-happier-article-1.2764220
Will you argue for the social encouragement of men being househusbands?
@Doctor Anon I thought you cared about statics?
And also, let me remind you: "a happy society is a strong one." I don't see how the negatives of the encouragement of the existence of househusbands would outweigh the positives; the encouragement would be barely effective; men have always done the work (fighting in wars, farming, governing, etc.), and nothing would change what's in their nature (what they've been doing for thousands of years), even if it's a new social view that encourages them to do nothing. Personally, I'd focus more on househusbands than housewives, because we live in a time where women still fight for human rights, deal with sexism from the societies they live in, and are often seen as the weaker, softer, less capable sex, whose job is to be baby-makers; women's employment at this time is important.
Okay, new topic, I'll understand if you don't want to respond.
14 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1