So you would have a community starve its people?

An industrial community isn't going to have much food

If that community didn't have enough for both, would you have one go hungry?

It's not the food source to them

It's a good source for the others.

That would be an agricultural community

I'm just asking how an issue like that would be solved under such a system.

When money isn't enough.

Aaaaaand if the community were not that sort?

They have food for their people, but not enough for two communities

Much less several.

Hahahahahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Alright. I'll just stop here.

If you actually believe that.

There is no point to talking to you.

Money can't bring back an entire Forest.

Nor can it mitigate that income.

A forest will produce money forever.

So you would have the other community pay all the money the others could have ever made for all time?

No. It can not.

If you think that then you really are ignorant.

A maple first can not be turned into a pine forest no matter how much you have spent.

And a maple Forest can not be brought back no matter how much you spend

It's been tried.

It was tried for years, tens of millions were spent.

And it was never done.

It failed every time.

It takes hundreds of years to grow a forest.

And only weeks, or days to destroy.

So you would have a community pay hundreds of years worth of lost revenue?

Or would it just be an oppsie doodles?

Now, don't get me wrong. I too believe that municipalities should have better autonomy.

The ability to circumvent a state/provincial government to a point.

And extend itself to the Federal.

It was done rich entrepreneur, he cut a maple Forest to try and rebuild it as a pine.

As soon as the pines started to grow, the maples would take priority, and when the pines died the maples for sun scorch.

My BF studied it in school because he is a forest technician.

Maples can not be in the sun.

They die. They get scorched.

Yeah, money can't fix everything.

That is not a good mind set to have..

It was money.

They tried for years.

No amount direct ever changed the results.

I also thought it would be possible to change it.

But after reading and looking at forests I eventually realized.

No.

"a park"

By the way this wasnt just planting pines over the maples

This guy stripped the land to the rock.

And replaced the soil.

And the maples still took priority

Because pines grow to maturity in a decade or two.

And then you can sell them

Maples take 40+

Yes.

For building materials.

He was trying to change a forest.

From hardwoods to soft woods.

It's not too hard to make a hardwood forest.

Unless the soil is acidic

But it won't be profitable for a long time.

Maybe if you had billions

You could remake a forest.

But it wouldn't be worth it and nature would do it in the same amount of time.

You could plant whatever trees you want, but ultimately it won't matter compared to what nature will do.

As described by the example above.

You could change everything and still nature will do as it will.

It just isn't feasible.

The money needed would be enormous.

It's just that chances are that it won't stay what you want for long without a ridiculous amount of maintenance.

Ban vaccines.

That would be easier.

It definitely is.

Viruses have changed, our immune systems have not had much time to actually adapt.

Due to vaccines.

If you got rid of it you would have people die of the flu. :P

Also

This is off topic.

I'm going to the chat.

Ooooh

Honestly though, I haven't gotten the flu in a long time.

I'm not sure what effect it would have on me now.

It's not adults that die of the flu.

It's kids and seniors.

ZA has been here forever.

Hmmmm

Depends on what that biologist is saying about biology.

Ah, your name changed again!

Looks as though somebody is trying to discredit you.

Why?

Because if you were to judge a doctor as a commoner then you would be judging your betters.

Why?

Yes.

But that's not judgment.

That's not judgment.

You should criticize.

Rather than saying, "You're wrong." You should just ask why they are correct.

And if they explain it, still being wrong, ask another question until they are unable to reply.