kang of kangz

that's debatable, but its a free country, you be fascist if you want

that's a bit pedantic now isnt it

ill rephrase: I don't *respecfully* disagree, but i am bound within the rules of this server and therefore am forced to do so

that's what im trying to do

civilly

oh ok

i didnt know the extent of what we can do in this thread

forum? what do you call this

chat i guess

swords > democracy

the one thing europoors got correct was conscription

the normie narrative is powerful

I like the idea of one not being a citizen until they do a sweden-style 1 year service

at age 18 for natural-born citizens

because then being a citizen actually matters

yeah like that, even though it's a satire

i thought they were both critiques, just on different things

ahh i see

the movie is still damn good imo, when you're aware of the critique it's hilarious in a weird way

still technically democracy ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

that's p much why democracy isnt inherently virtuous

isnt that still democracy by definition

if it isnt rigged of course

yeah but couldnt you have a direct democracy with a dictator that must be voted on

anarcho-zionism

they dont really work in practice, they're the absence of system

"Elections occur only in single-candidate races where the candidate is effectively selected beforehand by the WPK."

he did it

he broke democracy

g e n i u s

to be esoteric, how is having only 2 selected by their respective parties any better

we are korea confirmed

imo if it's socialism it's socialism

it's really hard to tell, considering that little war that they dealt with

doesnt jingoism also lead to a rome situation eventually

how so

the problem with that though, is that the real problems don't kick in untill far later down the road (if we're talking about the socialist form of it)

no, and that's why i am not a fan of corporatism

they always exist though

yeah but potential ones do

and corporations would be in favor of immigration to gt cheap labor

why not have an isolationalist policy that cant be democratically removed, and instate capitalism internally

nothing is perfect

you can only approach perfection

has a true monopoly ever existed

when

bing, safari, internet explorer compete

they aren't true monopoly

what he said

what;s the difference

between 6 and 1000

if the 6 are superior to the 994

why would anyone want a small business search engine, it would be terrible though

i would settle for that

lol

global capitalism would only be good if all countries had the same standards, and werent trying to kill eachother and that will NEVER happen

i think we can all agree there

uhh amd try again sweety :))

see capitalism is giving us the best possible graphics eber

<:kike:279092384355057664>

u know it my goy

https://streamable.com/4j78e

Ladies and gentlemen, we got em

Spread it

Cnn is kill

i want as many people as possible to see this

yeah, a few just popped up

if you want, but there already are some

im just trying to get it to all the memers i know

Wtf new propaganda already?

They're stepping it up

And to think a week ago they had a meeting with right wing channels to try to mend the rift and fix shit

Ye 4chan leaked it last night

about what lol

ill have you know im a radical enlightened™ centrist skeptic, im unstoppable

you'll find your place in the world some day

some day

on the strawpoll what would a constitutional capitalist confederacy where women cant vote be

what, a constitutional capitalist confederacy?

i doubt there are many other people who are in favor of such a gov't, except maybe traditionalists

mfw no gf

<:lordJoe:307261339699642368>

nah i just live in a thot zone and i have standards

authoritarian right

ay no degeneracy allowed <:ss:292376500714340352>

because if everyone were to do that society would fall apart

but if enough people do it's the same effect

look at what is happening now

im going from the traditionalist perspective

im neither 😮

there's a difference between something being outlawed and something being discouraged though

so by outlawing rape, I'm encouraging the suppression of other freedoms?

or murder, or what have you

hol up

i dont operate under the premise that freedom is inherently virtuous

then why use the NAP argument

it implies that it is virtuous

but why is social freedom a goal if it isn't virtuous? shouldn't a functioning society be a higher goal?

ok