globe Buster's uses flawed logic and pseudoscience

and strawman

That's not exactly correct

look at the graph of 8 inches per mile squared

It makes a parabola

is this accross the earth surface or just linear distance?

I have an exact equation ignoring the oblateness of earth

R*cos(d/R)-R

R is Earth's radius

how is it fake math

well atmospheric refraction does change it to be a bit larger

usualy

we see what too far away?

Non sequetur

atmospheric refraction effects this somewhat

also not everywhere on earth has this constant curvature

rainbows work by different refractive index of light thru water

and it forms a ring due to the symmetric geometry of droplets in fog/rain

all the videos I've seen never gave any sufficient evidence and or used logical falacies

by inductive reasoning I don't watch anymore because it is believed to be not worth the time

Altho I'm willing to reconsider

Yes

there is no mirror required

never is

You.mean reflection

Not mirror

the reflection is caused by the internal reflection inside the water droplets

and refraction

reflective source?

the light is reflected by the water droplets themselves

Internal reflection is responsible for most of the reflection

Difrent refractive index is what is responsible for the splitting of the wavelengths

the feeling is mutual

Only difference is you piss people off by actually vocalizing this feeling

Are you open to the idea you might be wrong?

Ok

not all

I had one.literaly tell me no

and that he has looked at all the facts carefully

and that he is not open

ok

all the evidence I've been presented is not indipendantly varifiable, fake, or just plain unreasonable

ok

if you don't accept those claims then the claims for your model suddenly become not evidence

Ok

Ok this is anecdotal evidence

true

yes

ok

Maybe he just had a bad day

I think I would have a bad day if I was in many degree negative weather

(altho I live in Alaska and I'm use to it)

or find out it is a globe

I'm sure that they wouldn't

Even if I did that and said that I'm sure they might do something more tricky like make a ploy that I'm trying to get money or something

I don't believe God exists so that's meaningless when you say satanists and god

i don't believe in Satan either

so it's still meaningless

god not obvious

even if it's a flat earth

Flat Earth may be infinite

yes

so why not worship the sun

yet you worship something you can't even see

that's even more mad

ok

I can't respect something I don't believe exists

and depending on what he believes and does I can't respect him even if he did

I'll respect that one act but as a whole I may or may not respect him as a being

ok even tho the radiometric dating says otherwise

multiple dating techniques agree

ok

?

false

They found remains of the very ruged protienes

They only found traces of it after they put the fossil into acids to dissolve the rock

now I can definitely say that's false

I'm sure the people who did the tests themselves would actually say you have a misunderstanding

it's traces detected by acid treatment

and by microscope

main stream is actually what gave you that idea in the first place

publishers trying to make a story

Garlic

why

I'm.sure they had a real reason

In that case I see no problem with it(minus the excessive)

an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable

a hypothesis only becomes a theory when it has been tested and repedatly failed to be falsified

?

yes

you said falsified

not falsifiable

yes

a bird is just a bird

I don't either

Not just can

A hypothesis must be falsifiable

I understand the math of special relativity and it's sound

especially when you understand how he derived it

He actually derived it from an idea of aether