BeLIEf is a strong word out there, so don't throw it like it's nothing.

That's fine man, take care

I'm reading it as we speak

One minute, finishing a debate

Looks like a dead squirrel to me and trust me, you can see here dead ones on a weekly basis, like they mainly can be found dead around the roads and no the vehicles that hit them, they don't stop or think twice about it.

Squirrels are usually grey, but they have lots of brown hair on their coats...they can be harder to spot around desert areas.

All the telemetry data just disappeared into thin air apparently

That's not the point. No one is saying that the Moon doesn't exist, the argument is about how no one has actually ever physically been able to contact it,

like some would argue that it's not even solid.

Apollo (the sun masculine deity) landing on the feminine (godess) deity of the moon has also Esoteric significance, the point was never about actually physically landing upon anything...they've admitted that they've lost the technology and that they simply can't go back, like either they did go there or they didn't, so it's good to actually look at the reasons as to why they didn't, because of what, etc....instead of just thinking that they did, because that's what's told in the textbooks.

People can believe that they did, I don't have issues with people just believing in things, but if one claims that it's irrefutable and they conclusively went there, well...that's pretty much the height of ignorance.. They supposedly accomplished it in the late 50s and yet, now that technology has been lost.

It's good to point out bullshit, when you realize that it is actually bullshit. Like it has nothing to do with the shape of the earth, I've talked with many Globers who have concluded that the Apollo missions were fishy to say the least.

the hell are you on about, more expensive? They spent like 140billion

163*

Needless expense? Are you kidding me? It's humanity's supposed greatest accomplishment, like they're supposed to land on the moon and they should've also included the colored cameras too, which they previously even used on earth to film some of their test footages? I'll tell you why they didn't include it and it's because it's easier to fake the footage and make people not focus too much on the questionable details that people pointed out.

We're talking about 163 billion here, like you can't even fanthom or even have a picture of how much money that actually is and for the time, you could get a lot done with that.

From mostly the popular/mainstream websites, you can check christopherrcooper and there are also various charts

https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4029/Apollo_18-16_Apollo_Program_Budget_Appropriations.htm

**Apollo 11** A comprehensive set of camera equipment was carried on board Apollo 11. **This included two 16mm Maurer motion picture film cameras, a color television camera in the orbiting Columbia**, and a *black and white TV camera outside of the lunar module to transmit to Earth Neil Armstrong's first steps on the Moon's surface.* A Kodak stereo close-up camera was used to film the lunar soil from only inches away. Three Hasselblad 500EL cameras were carried.

Those cameras that they used, including the dual 16mm Maurer motion picture film cameras were already huge by themselves, and they don't look that bigger compared to the other ones that they carried. As far as the transmission equipment goes, the whole supposed conversation from the Moon into the Oval office is not only virtually impossible at the time, but it's still impossible now. You can't even get some signal in some areas of the earth, let alone try doing it from the Moon.

Data Storage Equipment (DSE). To make the supposed recordings possible, they claim that they used something called a Data Storage Electronics Assembly, which even if you look into the official explanation, they're trying to explain it away how it should've been virtually impossible, but due to certain atmosphrenic circumstances, it was able to and I quote; *As a result, many of its recordings are barely, if at all, audible, with a constant high-pitched background tone. In the attached database, the recordings that are virtually inaudible are highlighted*

I mean it's impossible with all the technology and improvements we have made so far upto late 2018 into transmitters, strenghtening the signals in-between access points, etc...so to think that, they easily pulled something like that back in the late 60s/early 70s, it just doesn't add up.

And to make my self clear, this has nothing to do with the shape of the earth argument, which is what most people turn it into. People are still free to to think that they have scientific resources to back up the sphericity of the Earth, like that is not the point when it comes to the moon landings.

People are entitled to think as they wish, it's none of my business.

At the end of the day, we are born here and we die here...most of us won't go beyond 35k feet of altitude.

Speaking of food, I definitely need to spoil myself with some good food today

Sweet cupcakes

It's like almost 5 in the morning, Thursday

yea

still 1 hour behind me, for them it's like 03:41AM

I woke up at around like 1 AM, since the second I got home, took a shower, ate something and then literally fell asleep

I'm so horrible in the kitchen, like need to get myself a housewife...I can only cook pasta, soup and just the basics

good thing i'm lucky enough to have something going on for now, so hopefully 2019 will be a good year for me

Yeah, just another year to go through...it's literally just a +1 into my age, I guess not a lot will change

although I always say that, but I end up looking back

yeah

It might feel unlikely as of now, but in one year from now, we will see all the new things we've experienced, etc.