Trilo
Discord ID: 156515970683240449
144 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2
๐๐
lsd
Stop
I know your secrrt
You secret are a hamburger guy
Secretly
I want to be a Seeker of Truth
Pls help
Oh heck
The government and the GMOs dude
The gmos are altering our dma
there is no such thing as DNA that's a government conspiracy
It's called dma
dma stands for dinuclear molecule atoms
DNA is a lie
Yeah my grandpa told me. Even though top scientists disagree they work for big pharma so they are wrong
@RidleyChozo exactly dna is a lie it's dma
Because grandpa is god
rip
Well it was nice knowing yall
Guess ima get banned lmao
Yee I'm here just to have a lil fun that's all
You should study the equation F=G*(m1 *m2)/r^2.
Sorry cant send pics no permissions.
The path objects flow to is towards more force. Minimizing r^2 will maximize F since m1,m2, and G are constants. Minimizing r happens when objects move towards the center of gravity which would be the center of earth (technically the center isnt quite since the mass of the water would move it a bit but this is negligable). Thus the 'pseudoscience' model fits this description better.
F= force, m1 and m2 are the masses of the 2 objects, G= the universal gravitational constant and r is the distance between the 2 objects.
r is the distance between the 2 objects. More specifically it is the distance of the center of mass between the 2 objects. So for earth the center of mass is the center of the earth.
This is a well known equation I can provide citations if needed.
Find a point in 3D space. Then take a distance, say d= 1. If you map all points with distance 1 to that point you will get a spherical shape.
This can be demonstrated easily in 2D space by getting a protractor and spinning it around a point on a piece of paper. This is a circle.
Hence in order to minimize R, water would form in a circular shape
My argument is irrelevant to whatever you take as the diameter of the earth. Take whatever you want, and my argument should hold.
If you are arguing the earth is flat it makes no sense to argue water forms a spherical shape regardless of what phenomena causes it
The shape of the earths surface is irrevelent it will flow towards the location that minimizes R
Hold up my bad I'm in class I'll read what you sent me
gimme a bit lol
Computer engineering major
yes true slash
Lograian: one can take an angle from 1 side of the water to the center of the earth to the other end of the water. If this angle is negligable then practically speaking the water will appear in your image. If the angle is not negligable then the spherical phenomena will occur I described earlier.
Technically speaking this water is not completely strait however but the difference is too negligable to notice.
This can be explained intuitively by drawing a circle on your favorite graphing software. Pick a point on the circle and zoom into it a lot. It will appear to be a line even though it has curvature.
Probably not as other forces would be at plau
play*
for small angular values
oh heck
Go on your favorite graphing software. Choose a circle. Then zoom into it a lot. Report back to me what it look like? Not curved anymore perhaps?
Saying it a second time now.
deflected when I made my point for the 2nd time. Ah well guess I'm a 'troll' too even though I came with equations and visual examples
144 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2