How in the world are wars capitalism

Well that’s a bit broad

Socialism leaves it people in worse situations though

It was fragile

Also half of these are like famines and I just really don’t see how a famine is a result of capitalism

I don’t know enough about those events to make a certain opinion on them

But the colonization in Africa was definitely for military power over the Mediterranean

No it wasn't lol

It was gain docks, and bases across the medi

If you cant remember the name how are we supposed to confirm it?

India was ruled by the british crown

Once more the british crown

The africas were to poor to be worth colonizing though.

Yes true

Slaves were not a thing in france nor england during the colonizing

Petrolium isnt a very profitable venture in africa

if anything diamonds

?

Even then diamonds werent really found until 1940-1990s

Gold ok i can see why they might do it for gold

They werent even aware of many diamonds, gold, oil, or any other useful resources in africa during the 1870s

Once again slaves werent really a thing the 1800s

sure they had them early 19th century

idk about that but ill assume youre right. but its trade was largely eliminated after 1840s

the economic worth of slaves were diminishing anyways

Even then the only place to have slight economic worth would be India

But none of the oceanias were that wealthy

And wasnt the colonization of america like in 1490s

So were looking at the entire history of capitilalism?

I believe you could see why thatd be a bit skewed

Comparing all deaths to the long lasting capitalism to the relatively new idea of socialism is a bit unfair

No

Im saying that since capitalism has been around longer so itd only make sense that itd kill so many

Im talking about the time frame

Not the deaths themselves

you put capitalism midway through the race while you've only just started with socialism

Its a bit unfair to compare the hundreds of years that capitalism has exist to the very very new idea of socialism

the type of socialism that people are trying to get

Like the soviet unions style of socialism

Marxism was scientific socialism that no country fully adopted

until 1900s

No country adopted Marxism sure there were people who thought of its ideas but no country took part in managing themselves like that

Socialism in broad

the first socialist party was elected in 1899

So as i said capitalism was given a head start

The idea of socialism existed but no country adopted it

Like who?

Native Tribes

You do realize the problem with comparing Native Tribes with a few thousand people to a country with dozens of hundreds of thousands correct

Native Tribes arent countries

They couldnt be compared to what a country is

Ok

Im going to just ignore your entire post because scale wise what your saying makes no sense

and now your trying to compare native tribes to full blown countries

Yah know people who are using bows and arrows and have no materialistic values to people who have muskets carracks oil industry and even materialistic values

Ok a comparable example

Give me a comparable example

not a tribe

Something capable of being somewhat cultural equals

No

It had a few hundred years

No actual country had socialism until 1899

A tribe is a tribe

Thats two hundred years

Ok goodbye

indeed

https://tenor.com/view/uranus-anus-earth-missile-shoot-gif-5027627