how?

drug laws are pretty racist

warnok and ossof are going to win

especially crack vs cocaine laws

not for long lmao

drugs laws have historically been implemented in ways that target minorities, provide longer sentences towards minorities, and the mandatory minimums are also worse towards drugs that are used more by minorities.

he can legalize marijuana, abolish mandatory minimums, and make crack cocaine laws the same

white people shoot up schools the most often, should we stop them from going to school?

also, drug usage among white and black people are similar

how does this make any sense

george soros is it's leader 😈

isn't this the exact opposite of the kkk then

he will get the senate then, tonight lol

this is a cope, all of the remaining districts to vote are heavily democratic, i'll bet 45 dollars rightn ow

bro the military has killed more people than the kkk in the past 50 years what the fuck does this have to do with anything

do you know how many people live in the metropolitan area??? land doesn't vote my guy

that's where a majority of people live

yeah, that might explain why the kkk hasn't killed that many people

it did in michigan, georgia (during the presidential election), and philidelphia lmao

trump lost georgia cuz of atlanta

lmao

like that one black dude walking into his house with a sandwhich that the cops thought was a gun?

were you even following the election? atlanta is literally the reason why biden won GA, when all of the mail in ballots came in from the metropolitan area it swung the votes in favor of biden.

abortion isn't murder bruh

why the fuck should i care about something that doesn't have personhood

abortion is the peak of individual rights

plenty of reasons. i deserve moral consideration because i have personhood. fetuses don't

do you think i've had an abortion?

yeah but i'm a dude. if u didn't know, people with dicks can't have an abortion

how do you know a fetus can think?

you can react without thinking....

if i put a lighter to your hand, you'll remove your hand when u feel the heat and then realize that there is a lighter

that's a reaction without thinking

exactly, that's not thinking. thats just a reaction that your body carries out without you having to think about doing it

are you an anarchist?

being alive =/= thinking. two different things. do you think a cow that's alive can think? what are your qualifications for thinking? if you were to remain consistent, i'd surely hope that you are a vegan

no? i'm talking about the logical conclusion of their talking point, not mine

if i don't think abortion is murder why the fuck would i think masturbation is murder

LMAO

you aren't actually responding to my points, you know that right?

1. feeling pain is thinking
2. animals can feel pain
3. animals can think
4. we shouldn't kill fetuses because they can think
conclusion: we shouldn't kill animals because they can think
@ScaryScarab

sure, i don't care. killing that "life" is justified because the fetus isn't a person. it's the same way that we pull the plug on patients in comatose.

lmao u can actually respond. it's because, at that point, you are your own being. you are no longer necessitated to live within another being to sustain your own life.

so if a woman is going to die because they can't get an abortion, you would say an abortion is moral?

once again you can't respond. quick reminder, until you can make an argument against me, saying "wrong" doesn't actually mean anything.

you completely disregard the fact that it *doesn't matter* if it's alive. A fetus doesn't have *personhood*, because it does not exist on it's own, it is an extension of your body and therefore, if you are pregnant, it is morally permissable to abort the fetus/

killing the baby is justified

"killing"

lol

i wasn't responding to your point. that person said "someone values their own life, if they were to be threatened they would protect themselves". in that case, if a woman protects herself by getting an abortion, it would be morally permissable. that's what happens when you make a naturalist argument

i've already explained that i don't give fetuses moral consideration because they don't have personhood. we justify murder all the time, kyle rittenhouse was justified in killing the people that assaulted him (that is a justified killing). in the same sense, we are justified aborting a fetus because it does not personhood

do you not know what an analogy is? ur kinda stupid

1. fetus *i mispoke*, 2. yes, aborting the fetus is justified

real quick question. if someone was attached to you for 9 months, absorbing the nutrients that you absorbed, requiring to you to consume more resources, would you kill that person?

lmao "selfish" is irrelevant in a moral conversation. go learn basic philosophy

you can't understand basic moral principles, philosophy, or figures of speech. ur really slow

i'm making a logical argument for the moral permissibility of abortion. i truly hope ur not trying to bait some form of identity politics

https://youtu.be/PXW0annbFcE

Lmao trump’s tweets are hillarious

“At least we don’t loot and riot”
>storms and enters capital building

🤣🤣🤣

They r so underprepared

people still defend the confederate flag? kinda cringe bro