is a pier reviewed journal (PNAS) run by academics

I see no reason they would need cheap labor

I agree

exactly

they arnt a business

ima link it

https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/12/01/2014704117/tab-figures-data

yeah that guys like

unironic triple parentheses

thats not even like a dog whistle its closer to an air horn

like dude

if you mean jews

just say jews

the parentheses trick nobbody

then why not just say jews?

if its not meant t trick anyone

why not just say jews

less characters (4 as opposed to 6) so why not just say jews if you mean jews and you want people to know you mean jews

imagine being so smoll brian baby man that you need to add homosexual <:pepelaughingemote:767137824998686751>

dude

I called ad hominem "add homosexual"

and the spelling of small is what you fixate on?

I mean

of all the things

like I mean

I respect it

but I dont understand it

how is my intentionally bad grammar I did for a joke still more understandable than what I assume to be your actual attempt at making a written message

like what did that message even mean?

like did you even read the convo or did your closeted gay ass just read "homosexual" and get triggered af

again, thats the add homosexual fallacy

"Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong"."

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem)

also you didnt even get the "add" part of add homosexual right

you cant even copy paste correctly

"Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong"."
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem)

oh boy is this a trans people debate?

oh boy I smell blood in the water

"facts dont care about your feelings"

(Benjamin Shapiroid)

yeah those are called TERF's

(trans exclusionary radical feminists)

long story short

everyone on my side of the isle hates them

you can have them

please

for the love of god

take them off our hands

wym

a trans woman is

someone who due to chemical shenanigans I dont understand has a female brain, with female identity modifiers that was born into a male body

who then goes on to go

wait

I have a dick

fuck this

which is called sexual dysphoria

so they get sexual reaffirmation or sex change depending on who you ask to make what they physicaly are line up with what their brain was wired for

okay so like

what I discribed is an actual thing that happens because of people making shenanigans

if someone had the brain of a fly

they would die because they wouldnt be able to operate their heart

I figured I did before I moved on to the fly argument

oh

yeah sory

ill copy paste it into one message gimme a sec

someone who due to chemical shenanigans I dont understand has a female brain, with female identity modifiers that was born into a male body
who then goes on to go
wait
I have a dick
fuck this
which is called sexual dysphoria
so they get sexual reaffirmation or sex change depending on who you ask to make what they physicaly are line up with what their brain was wired for

to use an analogy

its like having a light switch on the wall thats wired to have 2 switches but the plate you put on it only has one switch

so you put a new plate on with a second switch so the wiring fills its function

okay I may have explained it bad

@Lil Pastaa wanna move to debate 1

less crowded

I think this is the debate version of calling a first grader a poo poo head because thats the only insult he understands

"speaking his language" so to say

for one

Bassed

for two

norman as according to scripture god is the son / lamb of god

not god in and of himself

(so yes Jesus was a furry according to bible cannon)

also

norman get better at scripture

you shouldn't need to have basic biblical concepts taught to you by an agnostic