Cognitive dissonance

You didn’t read the document.

Come back when you’ve read it. The connection is explained in detail

Even a bolded section mentions the connection by name

No, that’s not what the document is about.

Dominion bought Sequioa...

It uses Sequioa

Smartmatic and Sequioa share source code

Read page 9-12 on the document. Challenge yourself to read material that doesn’t agree with your beliefs. You’ll grow intellectually

No you haven’t.

You said the connection to Venezuela was something akin to a restaurant meet-up. That’s all I need to know that you didn’t read shit

Aight man. You do you. No use trying to get through to you. The facts are there, whether you like it or not

Praying

Trump 2020

Trump 2020

What

If Trump gets elected by some miracle, are you Biden supporters going to resort to violence

Republicans? No l

Lol

Why would they

When I say miracle, I mean the judicial system actually issues revisions based on irregularities uncovered

It would be legitimate.

But miraculous

Well, they have no justification to be mad at republicans if “blockbuster” stuff is uncovered and echoed by various non-partisan authorities

Why?

If they in fact cheated

It’s them to blame

I would say the Michigan audit results are getting there...

A 68% “error” rate vs the allowable limit of 0.0008%

And 82% rejection rate

For the first time, adjudication logs have been deleted

It’s certainly a red flag. Nothing normal about that.

A criminal is not going to say, you got me guys, we committed fraud.

There will be denial.

By default.

No, it would cause harm to the DNC for perpetrating it.

Occam’s Razor is not a law.

A simple explanation is not always the explanation.

Truth is stranger than fiction.

Again, no CEO is going to admit to criminal wrongdoing in public.

Not really.

Talking about the CEO — not an auditor.

““Russell James Ramsland, Jr. and his team at ASOG have the cybersecurity and forensic capabilities and expertise that cannot be dismissed. In fact, looking at their team, their patents, their experience, we now have a credible analysis that as I predicted, the Algorithms being used in the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed to create systematic fraud and influence election results and in this case, not in the favor of President Trump,” said Gary Miliefsky, a founding member of the US Department of Homeland Security and publisher of Cyber Defense Magazine.”

Which auditor? Lol.

Not necessarily.

Hand recounts are only as good as the person doing them. Project Veritas already released footage of people counting Trump ballots for Biden during a hand recount. In addition, the QR code on the ballot receipt is not countable in a software-independent manner. All you have is a text summary. The QR code in the machine could have registered a different vote

Why delete adjudication logs in the 2020 election, when they were available for past elections? That is ginormous red flag

Clearly not, when Trump ballots still get counted as Biden ballots — get placed in a Biden pile as soon as the ballot is called out verbally

Nothing sketchy about them. They’ve won every lawsuit questioning their integrity.

The video speak for themselves

Uh, yes they have.

Settlements =/= loss — If that’s what you’re gonna reach for

He has 327 retractions from other people on his wall

About project Veritas

That is a retraction. You make false claim, then you correct them after pressure

Yes, it is. The big editor’s note saying that the article was incorrect about a particular piece of information about Project Veritas is a retraction. When somebody says James O’Keefe is a felon (He’s not), and his lawyers pressure the libelist to say said person is making false claims and to correct their statements, and the person does, it’s a retraction of the original claim

2.
a withdrawal of a statement, accusation, or undertaking.

That’s what these articles do.

Yes, media does engage in this about Veritas,By removing the false information from the article, and replacing it with something else, that is a withdrawal.

The original claim/accusation is withdrawn.

The corrections are so substantial that they have impacted the main points of the article

Watch his retraction videos

According to the articles.

Self-own?

He just shows you what statements looked before and after

Point is, I would not trust media reporting after that many corrections

327 fuck ups is serious enough to not give them any traffic, forever.

Not exactly a right-wing article lol

Is the author conservative?

He admits he’s a Never Trumper.

In other words, a RINO.

Trump is the Republican Party.

Ben Shapiro was also a never-Trumper.

As much as you want to discredit O’Keefe, you cannot. His impact has been unquestionable

His exposes have lead to firings.

To Congressional investigations. Hearings.

He doesn’t say anything, he lets the videos speak for themselves.

Unedited. He publishes CNN calls everyday, exposing what kind of shit-show the network truly is

Nothing substantial in that article.

I don’t need to believe him, I just observe recorded video. Nothing deceptive about it.

Veritas is left’s worst nightmare

The fraud investigations are, in great part, thanks to his work

Yessiree.

Prove one video of his way filmed this way.

Was*

No video there.

Nothing of importance there.

No video is described in that article.

You haven’t reviewed the original video and are relying on secondary source commentary to make up your mind for you.

The goal of O’Keefe’s videos is to expose unethical behaviour. He accomplished this. The article does not dispute this.

He got fired because of the video.

Did you read them, or did you look up an article?

You have not looked at the video.

You’re accepting secondary source commentary as unquestionable truth.

This is a problem

You do not review the primary source material being referenced and just assume the author talking about it has done his/her job 100% truthfully, honestly, and without omissions. This is a problem.

He was out to make a point and damage ACORN. That is the motive of undercover journalism. This motive does not render the footage false. Please send the video being referenced.

Like I said, settlements =/= loss.

That is a settlement.