he means its beneficial relative to interests

its not even an ethical use of beneficial

he doesnt need any ethical grounding at all lmao, his whole system follows

just hit him with moral anti realism and collapse his "ethical" basis

his whole position is based on imagining morality exists and that it somehow is integral to human action when weve been killing and raping eachother other things we want for how long

woland should attack there even being any oughts at all

hes smuggling his supposed "ought" into asking for oughts lol

lmao what

it would cease to be a meaningful identity

if it was universal

my pfp is dionysus

@Erlik ᚯ that was p good debate shame he went pissy baby mode after

lol this is based, why yes I stumble onto big streamer to stutter in debate

oh nooooo!!!! someone from my group couldnt represent my views right!!!!

mention what were those two african tribes that genocided eachother

bantus n tutus

something like that

i bet ur so quirky n different

twitter is a disease

something something identity crisis over retard pretending to make their arguments

ok but you get to set people on fire

shake it off

burst into flames and run as fast as possible into enemy lines

lol