I want a theocracy with me as king

Basically would be the USA

but with Christians

If they were to follow the word of God they shouldn't be emotional

the rules are written

Roman's

has the rules

I said basically the same

easily remove that

But remember there would be no need to remove the first amendment if my country is full of Christian

You can have free speech

Christians aren't supposed to force you to convert

Thats between you and God

The truth

people's will always reject the truth

that's illogical

Do you know the laws of logic?

doesn't seem like it

the statement truth is subjective is illogical

truth is either true or its not true

The objective truth

God

And you know that how? @Dr.Wol

The claim there is no evidence for him to exist doesn't disprove that he exists

nice copy and paste

oof

@Dr.Wol Do you believe in the laws of logic?

there are 4 laws

The law of non contradiction
the law of excluded middle
the law of identity

I forgot the 4th

it's fine though

Do you believe in those?

there is a 4th in deeper philosophy

maybe there is just 3

what ever

The law of identity: P is P.
The law of noncontradiction: P is not non-P.
The law of the excluded middle: Either P or non-P.

Now do you believe in those?

God doesn't fall outside of those three

Now why do you believe in them?

Yes the laws of logic

Why do you believe in them?

not my argument

You don't understand them

there is no both

The law of identity: P is P.
The law of noncontradiction: P is not non-P.
The law of the excluded middle: Either P or non-P.

either is 9 or its not 9

ahh

OK

so either its correct or its wrong

there is no middle

Define truth

Weird definition

define knowledge

~~a justified true belief~~

is the definition

To understand reality do you use the laws of logic?

Since you believe the Laws of logic are true can you prove them?

Why do you believe it then?

To prove the laws of logic you would have to use the laws of logic.

Either you use them or everything you say is illogical

You haven't?

How are you reading what I type?

you are using them

P is p

you means you

law of identity

I'm trying to have a discussion with you

I'm not talking about what is p

Just debating

Why do you?

to say that it's reasonable would already be using the laws of logic

begging the question fallacy

Of course but I'm speaking on both of our foundations

But can you prove the laws of logic?

math already used the laws of logic

begging the question fallacy

it is

"no, but it would be illogical to assume he does based on 0 evidence"

give me evidence for the laws of logic

If you don't want to continue we can stop

Nope

I am not

you are using an axiom that is unjustified

which is a fallacy

justify it

prove it

Math is using the laws of logic

you can't justify the laws of logic using math

because math uses them

t!rank

!rank

We designed them?

So without humans the laws of logic aren't a thing?

@JohnOakman 👌

So without humans would a rock be a rock?

or would it be something else?

semantics

Knowledge is a justified true belief

that's illogical

I'm done

take a class in philosophy