So if the rules state that racism is not allowed am I allowed to post quotes from donald trump being racist?

That isn't the answer to the question I asked <:this:624681355090984970>

I never said he did say anything racist, I asked if it was against the rules to post racist quotes from him

If I don't get a clarification for what I asked then I'll assume I'm allowed to since the rules do not explicitly state that I cannot, they state that I cannot be racist, which posting a quote in disagreement of that racism, is not in fact being racist.

Unless that is it would be considered non factual content, in which case I would argue that I am not in agreement with it therefore I am not being racist by disagreeing with racism

I agree

Oh I didn't know that but is it real?

I can register a domain with a .co.uk extension if I wanted to, and I live in the US: https://www.domain.com/registration?flow=domainDFE&flowid=25&search=a-random-domain-name.co.uk#/domainDFE/1

@scottmag14 Why wouldn't you want to pretend you're a british organization?

@Dead Baron I would have to agree that China is in no way being truthful about their numbers, especially considering even the numbers they have reported are suspiciously looking like someone is just using a viral spread formula and putting slight variations in. Honestly, I'd really expect them to try and hide their numbers as they don't want to start a war and they want their people to be under their control.

I'm personally suspicious about our own numbers though. It seems like with the funding cut Trump put on the CDC they can't get tests out, and the lack of acknowledgement in that area from Trump is making me suspicious that it could be intentional, although time will tell I suppose.

give me your opinions on this Obama prism

They can only block the domain from showing in their country, they're not allowed to do anything beyond that unless I were hosting in England

@Day Fun fact: That's actually a good way to get your sentence increased wildly and possibly get yourself in even more trouble, so yes it is very illegal after you've sworn oath ;\)

Christ @John Lemon @Dead Baron that's not a good response to this situation *at all*. I'm going to be real here and say that it's just *not okay by anyones standards* to say that type of stuff in response to such a serious situation. Where you went wrong is by *immediately* making an assumption with no information about the situation at hand. Think about stuff you've done that you've regretted, and think about why you might have done those things rather than making unsupported assumptions about someone who just tried to end their life.

Yuck.

Listen bud, I'm sorry you feel the way you do, but where in that article does it say anything about her doing anything like that. The fact that you just essentially told everyone that *you* think that a teenager who just attempted to end their life would do that stuff says something about you as a person, and it's not something to be proud of that you'd assume any random teen would do that. That behaviour is illegal, and it's disgusting you'd make that kind of assumption.

You are making completely unbased assumptions, and the fact of the matter is, you contribute to that ratio by making such assumptions about them. It's disgusting that you are in support of such an assumption when you have absolutely *no* information about her life. Disgusting.

Both of you.

Yuck you're both disgusting.

Any sensible person does not make such completely and utterly far fetched and gross assumptions about anything this serious. You very clearly have no clue what the word "autism" means beyond a completely basic understanding of it, and it fucking hurts to see that. If you even took 5 seconds to find out what autism actually is you'd know that it can genuinely have enormous impacts on the way a person behaves and what they find socially acceptable. Not only are you poking fun at someone's death, you are poking fun at people with serious disabilities when you have no clue what their situation is and have no clue how those disabilities work. All I have left to say is, don't teach your children that suicide and autism is funny, otherwise, you're going to ruin their lives in the future and I'd feel terrible for them that you'd make them such disgusting people and they wouldn't know any better.

Clearly you haven't taken 5 simple seconds to fact check yourself there. It's fucking disgusting that you pretend to know what autism is when you clearly don't understand anything about what it even is. You're digging yourself deeper, and I'm not going to help you out when you get flamed irl about your utter bs.

Yuck.

You're a disgusting human being. I'm done talking, because you really don't deserve to speak when that's your response to this. Honestly, you're fucked up.

Lmao

Honestly, thank you. I agree with everything you've said here, and you've phrased it well.

That's a pretty selfish way of saying than 4.4 is a slightly larger number than 1.

It's very selfish to focus on one group of people and pretend the other doesn't matter. This isn't about what group of people has more trouble, it's about the fact that it's a problem at all. Honestly, you are ridiculous.

You stated that "we should be focusing on the larger issue" after stating that male suicide is the larger issue.

You additionally stated that the person "committed suicide for no reason" as well as calling names, and making gross assumptions about things.

Direct quote from you.

These aren't "elements" these are people

So you're saying that that screenshot is out of context?

You directly stated "[Women's suicide] is 20% (in comparible size) [to male suicide]." prior to stating "Lets focus on who actually needs help" which is implying that women do not need help in this situation.

This isn't a matter of mischaracterization, this is blatantly what *you* said.

I didn't post about male suicide, because male suicide is completely irrelevant. It doesn't matter who the hell is male or female. You're so stuck on how I'm "mischaracterizing" you, except you blatantly stated that women do not need help because "men need help far more than women."

How is my age relevant to this conversation? Are you trying to take another low blow because you have no footing here? Do you realize the lengths you're going to prove you're somehow in the right about this?

That's what it seems like to me.

You can phrase it however you want, but that doesn't change what it is. Let's focus on the relevant conversation, instead of trying to take low blows.

I do not care how old you are. It's not relevant to the conversation.

You are using the fact that I "didn't post about male suicide" as an attack on me. This was never about gender. Nobody fucking cares what the hell the gender is but you.

Your next point was to ask for my age, then when I refuse to answer, assume I am "adolescent."

I called *you* disgusting because of what you said about someone's attempted suicide.

I completely disagree and it's disgusting that you think that she did.

We don't know. Remember how I said, you **do not have information**?

You are making incredibly far fetched assumptions about the person in the article that was posted, and now me in an attempt to make yourself look like you're in the right. That is why I said anything at all. Because you stated something in an attempt to degrade others to put yourself on top. Because you laughed at an attempted suicide of anyone, regardless of their fucking gender. Because you have repeatedly attempted to take low blows over and over at everyone in opposition to you.

This isn't about "male suicide" or "female suicide" that's what I'm fucking talking about. It doesn't matter what fucking gender the person is.

What have I specifically said in an attempt to "sound intelligent?"

I gave you quotes, now quote where I have attempted to look smarter than you.

I guess you can't find one can you? Maybe it's because I haven't and you're *trying* to take another low blow? Insulting someone you believe is younger than yourself.

I genuinely don't know what you're saying John.

Honestly, you're out here talking about how you believe I'm "adolescent" but everyone older than a 5th grader knows joking about suicide, calling names, using disabilities as an insult, and using age to win arguments is not mature behaviour.

You quite literally said "lol" in response to an attempted suicide

Want a nice screenshot for you so you can find your message?

It's not putting words in your mouth when there is a message of you saying it.

That's quite literally *you* putting words in your mouth

My mistake.

> It's very selfish to focus on one group of people and pretend the other doesn't matter. This isn't about what group of people has more trouble, it's about the fact that it's a problem at all. Honestly, you are ridiculous.
@Hexcede

@John Lemon Hmm I wonder why I admitted and clarified to others it was a mistake? Maybe because my intentions aren't being an asshole.

This is your response to a debate

Your response to the article

Stating that it was over nothing and acting like its not a big deal because you believe that

Stating male suicide is more important

Getting flustered because I didn't mention male suicide when the topic was unrelated to male suicide, it was *in fact* just suicide.

Mhm we're *all alts* typing at the same time because we disagree. We're all definitely the same person because we disagree. We all don't feel bad for male suicides even though everyone has specifically stated that this is about *suicide* not gender and the gender is completely irrelevant.

The "simp" thing isn't relevant either, in fact, I've completely ignored it every time you have said it. What's relevant is that you blatantly stated that male suicide is more important than female suicide because of "numbers"

That's blatant sexism, and there is absolutely no way you can twist it around and make it otherwise.

You stated that female suicide *is not important* because there are statistically more male suicides.

"Men need help far more than women"

"yet here you are simping over some pretty girl who killed her self" even though I stated gender is not relevant

It's not mischaracterization, it's quite literally a ***direct*** quote

Mischaracterization would be if I told you you said something you didn't or created false lies about what you believed. In fact, you are the only one mischaracterizing anyone.

I called *you* disgusting

I wonder why.

Unless you find a quote of me stating that everyone is disgusting, that is quite literally mischaracterization.

I have all the time in the world to argue about this, and to be completely honest I'm enjoying how utterly twisted this guy is acting in front of *everyone*.

I'm not drained at all by this.

Mhm, and you sure do enjoy your "mischaracterization"

I wonder why you've stopped talking about it?

Oh maybe it's because *you are literally the only one doing it*?

Lmao

Yeah I'm very upset.

So upset.

I am so offended and shaken by your low blows that I might tell my parents!

I'm smirking in my chair right now

I wouldn't call it angry

You can't stop me!

I'm fairly sure, in fact, you're the one getting the reality check from several people who are in disagreement. I went ballistic when you literally stated blatantly and clearly, no possible confusion that male suicides are more important than female suicides, not in fact, about rates.

That's quite literally exactly what you said @John Lemon

Care to throw another "mischaracterization" in there?

The topic was about *a suicide* not *what gender the person was you fucking nimwit*

No that was in response to one thing.

I corrected myself and moved on.

It's not mischaracterization to say I'm wrong.

Now we're talking about how you blatantly stated that male suicide is more important than female suicides.

This was ***never*** about gender.

This is quite literally *an argument*

Why don't you google "define argument" for me and tell me what it says.

It's always been an argument because you've always been in disagreement with everyone around you.