christiam
Discord ID: 288511155532595200
2,245 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/23
| Next
friends on twitch
maybe not trolling but it's most probable.
or just being h*mo
yes, you're literally fornicating rn
i can't tell if cucked or not.
nazi cat pfp but uses lefty-looking cartoons on twitter
and cartoons are for leftists, real right-wingers use realist art
no horseshoe theory is false
they're just confusing me
pol compass results
lefties always use cartoon pfps though
and they love degenerate art
embrace classical art
>right-wing
>not knowing what degenerate means
choose one
what's your position on ancap and capitalists @Pug
it's important
no that's degen
No, Trump does stuff I sometimes dislike
I'm not a hardcore Trump supporter, I was unvetted from this server multiple times b/c of it.
I'm a traditionalist and nationalist, not a semi-neocon capitalist
mad cuz LARP
Guys, stop embracing the unfettered free market
Not a cuck, but capitalism is a progressive force which has destroyed the family unit and has decimated traditional values.
Lmao, I'm a traditionalist, you can't ban me.
Google only received 800 million in subsidies, a fraction of their total profits
so guys what's with the lincoln bashing?
As if that's bad in wartime.
Yes, but that argument also concedes that the United States would've been dissolved or weakened.
Secession was also never mentioned in the constitution regardless, as if the South even had a guaranteed right.
This wasn't a social contract, it was a political contract between numerous political entities.
Furthermore, if political entities have complete autonomy and self-decision, then it was the North's right to conquer the South.
A social contract is an agreement between the state and a person, a political contract is an agreement between two political entities.
I think Reddit banned every subreddit i actually enjoyed.
r/CringeAnarchy, r/MDE, r/MillionDollarExtreme
T_D has been getting cucked for a long time anyway, I honestly don't even care what happens anymore.
Russia and China will help both sides to draw the war longer.
True.
So when is T_D going to move out of its libertarian phase and embrace the third position?
That's the real question.
Yes, protectionism is horrible and multinationals are the best.
Well then you aren't a true full-blooded capitalist.
And yes
It was /s
That's hard to achieve, unless you tariff every existing country at once.
Tariffing is also not enough. Businesses need to be given incentives and punishments for doing the right and wrong things.
Unless you completely embargo a country, a fractional tax on select goods will barely dent companies.
I'm not saying it's necessary to destroy these companies, but they can handle a 10% hike. Companies are producing the majority of their product in China.
*Or other Asian countries
Companies are actually moving to South Asia at alarming rates as well, to avoid the political cross-fire between US and China
And zeph is right.
An example of the ideal American market can be seen in the 1950s. The ethics were clearly superior.
This is not necessarily true. Morality and culture haven't evolved naturally over the past 50 years. Both have been molded by celebrities or corporations.
Different countries have different moral standards, so businesses tend to act differently in each country. I can agree on that.
But in the West, it seems that businesses have pushed this ultra-progressive agenda. They've been very successful at liberalizing the population.
Yes, it's also celebrities and politicians.
Celebrity culture is the front-face of cultural decadence.
The government isn't inherently progressive.
Conservatives surrender everything.
They are liberals from 10 years ago.
Honestly, schools, in my experience, aren't pushing globalization.
Typically, it depends on each teacher.
But, what does effect the cultural stance of our nation, is celebrities.
That's basically grift right in 3 sentences.
Turning point USA celebrated when Nick Fuentes got banned. They don't really care.
Culture can certainly be influenced by government interference. It seems our government has been largely indifferent when it comes to cultural matters, only endorsing new changes (i.e. gay marriage) when they become wildly popular.
In Hungary, the govt. initiated a massive fertility program that increase fertility rates.
In China, for the worse, the government destroyed old Chinese ideas such as Confucianism.
So, it's highly plausible that culture is influenced by government, among other things.
Even when corporations decide to push gender theory?
Gucci, for example, hasn't seen a major decline in profits, yet they recently launched an ad campaign whose central idea was "gender-fluidity".
The average person isn't culturally conservative, so it's not like they care if Google promotes globo-homo.
The objective wouldn't be to out-legislate apathy. It would be to prevent companies from pushing destructive cultural changes.
Too idealistic for today's government, obviously, but a conservative culture is superior to a liberal one.
And how so?
By pushing open borders?
A company has economic reasons for pushing degenerate liberal things, because consumerism and open-borders generate huge profits.
I do agree, to an extent, that a government could be culturally destructive, like in China.
I'm not advocating for a general or vague cultural filter, I'm advocating for a specific ban on certain destructive things.
It's possible, like with smoking for example.
We stopped smoking ads, and it had an effect on # of smokers.
I mean, their personal agenda barely costs them a fraction of their total profits.
They have money to spare, especially to influence the nation.
Like I said, specific bans on the ability to PUSH habits, not the habits themselves.
The government would be able to do that now if Democrats had complete control.
The reason why this hasn't been done is because of plurality.
This was aimed at younger audiences, as described by GUCCI themselves.
The fact that companies are allowed the freedom to push this propaganda at children is why I hold my position.
The government, in theory, has as much power as the people gives it.
I know, for a fact, that many people would be angry if the government banned propagations of gun culture
However, even in a pluralistic society, I don't think, for a second, that anyone defends what's shown in this video.
I don't know if that's enough, is all I'm saying. My generation, at such a young age, doesn't really care for traditional values.
Most people are too apathetic as well, most boycotts fail miserably because no one commits anymore.
They also ruled the US govt. can ignore constitutional rights during wartime when they imprisoned Japanese-Americans in WW2.
2,245 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/23
| Next