:0

to save lives????

Thats not the argument

the argument is everyone should have an education

not select few

They would still higher the person of higher education

that dosent mean that the other doctor shouldnt have an education

or be taken seriously

...

I would rather have a doctor

????

Is a doctor better than nothing

assuming the doctor had the credenials to be hired

but some people dont have an option

they only have said average one

...?

they do

because everyone is tested

to see there knowledge

and skill

in said field

but each are given the same oppurtunites

what if you CANT go to the good one because they have 10 patients

if we have select few quality doctors

there will be less help for people

meaning you might have to wait

hours or days

or months

NOT A BAD DOCTOR

A DOCTOR WHO HAS EDUCATION IN THE SUBJECT

because

the school

as long as its not terrible

givers them the resources

to exel

in said field

the person

who is goign to college

but

thats not nessesarily true

?????

but then

the people

who cant afford that

shouldnt be left for dead

no

no

okay

or 1 good

and then you make less money

then the 1

who can take 1 patient

as long as

the educatioons the docotrs each have

is good enough

they get

to work and will get a good reputation

what

k

and there are 100 patients all needing immidate care

but the hospitals

have 1 fuckign good doctor

instead of enough to save those 100

:0

go

"doctors" thats where you are wrong

doctor*

but they couldnmmt

;'sdhil;hdgfsdg

they couldnt

because as we said earlier

the demand for doctors

is so high

that if we have select people

that caan become doctors

we wont have enough

for 10 to each hospital

because

there

isnt

enough

doctors

in

the

scenrio

analogy*

if i couldnt get into hospital A (WHICH I WOLDNT BE ABLE TOO) B

SO I COULD GET THE HELP I NEED

now if you want to argue if specalists

need a different education

we can talk

but

there

isnt

doctors

to hold

positions

enough*

...

no