well yeah maybe not if he was representing a party but he is not he is representing him self

thats why its more expensive

because he is not representing a party he is representing himself

okay thats false he only raised like 5 million he even said it himself

okay then 1 he and his campaign said they made 5 million at the most him and his other employees said that on ny times 2 he showed his revenue to them

also don't say that they are facts unless you absitlotly know they are not i mean im just putting out what he said

then don't call them facts unless you absitlotly know that they are

i highly dought that because it illegal to tell other people of a persons revenue unless the person wants to openly talk about it

so if they did

then that is going to be some actions for sure

unless bernie wanted them out

it is a lot of money that is true than 1 they are lying and theres prove thats why there is isn't a lawsuit yet and 2 unless Bernie wanted them out

which i highly dought

or 3 they were wrong

who ever said that bernie is makeing

566k

well than why did you say that the campaign said that?

and i highly dought they did because it illegal for the person that pays someone money to tell other people about there revenue unless the person had person wanted it out and gave him permission

so if they did

there is going to be some actions

yes it is but its illegal for them to talk about it publicly with out the candidates permission

so if its true what you are saying

than 1 they wrong or 2 they got permission from Bernie

its uncertain

or not

they might they might not

its uncertain

its Washington post they could be bias other times they can speak the truth

still they could or not

did they get Bernie's permission to say that?

does it say anywhere in there?

really?

does it say he openly gave consent? and im not saying its a conspiracy lol your taking shit out of my mouth

its uncertain is all i said

if they did get his permission

then yes it most likely be true

but if not

then its uncertain

does it say in the article they did get it from him though?

im asking did they or not?

lol

okay then yes it most likely is true but i heard on that ny time article a diffrent story on how he made 5 million at the most

and they got consent from him too

yeah its also another one saying he makes 5 million at the most

because the nyt is probably one the most centrist news stations in the country and okay i will

https://youtu.be/NvM_oa2yblw

there is the video

and here is the article

https://nyti.ms/2tuJQE2

it says it in the article

its just not the head line

also fox news is very flimsy

okay but on forbes it says he is making a 2,5 million when you said he made 19 million?

they said it on the screen though

okay then

good night

i guess

okay im looking at the business insider and its saying he is making 2 million from his campaign

so there is multiple stories on Bernie's money

no im looking at this one https://www.businessinsider.com/bernie-sanders-net-worth-assets-house-salary-book-sales-2019-2

im even looking at where they got the info from

okay but the article you just sent me tells me he is actually making 18.2 at the most and that is not exactly what he is making

but yes

that is a lot

for the most

so then is Venezuela socialist?

yeah well he believes since my source is not popular he believes that Venezuela is socialist i was not focus on which i popular i was focused on to if Venezuela is socialist or not

and i said its not that its capitalist

"socialister"?

"badderer"?

lol

omg this is epic

"socialister"?

<:nou:583247407165341696>

<:peepodumb:538083903835996176>

okay now ik your just memeing lol

you in leftypol?

bruh you should

i can't i need to ask the admin there

to get an invite

okay

i have a invite

ill send it to you in dm

How?

the Soviet Union did not kill that much people as most people claim

capitalism has killed more

plus even if the soviet union did kill that much people

capitalism still would have killed more and thats a dumb argument this study that capitalism killed more is from 2010 to today

https://youtu.be/QnIsdVaCnUE

in this video and the sources in it

as well as the 20million people dying per year under the capitalist 3rd world

then why has the population not drop?

this is the soviet union in 1926 though

that is the soviet union

from 1926 to 1991 and the population has not droped

so how could they have killed 100 million people?

it doesn't add up

this is the soviet union not russia

this is the soviet union in 1926 though
that is the soviet union
from 1926 to 1991 and the population has not droped
so how could they have killed 100 million people?
it doesn't add up