Communism literally ignores human nature

You haven't explained anything so I see zero reasoning in your statements.

and dont be smuggy with me, not my fault you fail to explain yourself.

"how they claim it brings greed. Greed is inherited, it's evolutionary trait" Tell me what's wrong here.

Saying CONTEXT will not make it be false

Lol, bunch of false accusations there. I'm not ignoring the context, what I've said is factually correct and you haven't pointed out what is wrong about my definition (you called me out on saying I have no idea what greed is) , rather you're changing the topic now - without defining what it actually is, you're just using word sementics. And your statement is wrong, communism can also "cause" greed - and it has been proven a lot of times via expending black market in USSR, despite state-control market. You need to know what the premise of the communism aka Karl Marx is - human is the product of the environment, not the genes. But that is false. And saying capitalism is an extreme catalyst for greed because everyone earns a different amount - yeah so what? My statement was that greed is something inherited (and you dodged that), inequality is not necesarily bad, especially in case of free market.

And sex is not the action of reproducing btw, atleast learn how to get it right.

You are horrible via definitions.

I'm using actual examples, you're not using anything but word semantics.

Well you have proven you don't know what sex is.

And you have proven you don't know second economy of Soviet Union existed. Which goes towards my point that greed is inherited, rather than solely the cause of environment.

Again long essay inc?

Well, it isn't the act of reproducing, that's one.

So you were wrong there.

Second of all, it is necessary. Because communism does not get rid of greed. Greed is evolutionary trait (like I stated), it is not solely the product of environment (where Karl Marx was wrong) - and this was my argument to begin with.

It is a good example to disprove communism's failed attempt to get rid of greed in practise. In theory, they're wrong by even rejecting human nature.

Are you typing in word then copy pasting? Lmfao.

Just goes to show you're not very confident in your arguments

😴 😴 😴 😴 😴

Typing... stopped typing... typing ... stopped typing.. You're literally the worst debater ever

Yeah you were using sex as an example, but your definition isiquite obviously wrong. Quite ironic that you blamed me for not knowing what greed is, altho I clearly defined it for you. You did not use the word generally, so nice try trying to dodge it now, sex is NOT the act of reproducing so your statement was wrong, simple as that. Second of all, you have shown once again you fail to comprehend things. I never claimed greed is solely the product of genes, infact I only stated it is not SOLELY the product of environment - give me a quote where I stated that? Can't? Obviously, point proven. 😉 Well... It's just funny because something tells me you'd do awful in a vocal debate.

I'm not wrong, I said it is not SOLELY the result of environment. Nice comprehension skills. I'll be waiting on that quote.

I didn't ignore you, fact of the matter is - you said sex is act of reproduction - which is not. Doesn't matter what the use behind it was.

Second of all, yes you did fail to comprehend things because you said my statement was wrong. Which wasn't - unless you can point what was wrong about me saying "Greed is evolutionary trait (like I stated), it is not solely the product of environment (where Karl Marx was wrong) - and this was my argument to begin with." Your reasoning was that it is both - which I never claimed it wasn't. Just goes to show you lack comprehension issues and you were caught off-guard.

Nurture and nature aren't mutually exclusive? Please explain this, because I'd like to expose your lack of understanding once again.

Btw, you were the first one to insult me. Just saying.

I'd engage properly if you did

Anyways sorry if I offended you, cheers

Lmao, I only asked you to explain that - who cares if I left off the quote - you can explain it in which you didn't. You started crying about how I didn't use the whole quote - who gives a shit when I'm asking for explanation and not calling you out on it being false? But clearly you already know my intentions. Disgenious. Oh and btw, from you: ""sex" would mean the action of reproducing" - False but whatever.

Just going in circles now, not back-tracking on my true statements anyways

Retard, it's not out of context - I literally quoted what YOU said. I told you to FURTHERMORE EXPLAIN IT. It is NOT out of context when I'm giving you teh chance to EXPLAIN what I just quoted, I haven't strawmanned you once. What an autist lmao

What difference does it make, autist? I was asking for further explanation - it does not mean my attention was to strawman you or change the context of what you're saying. And once again, your example is shit - I'm not telling anyone what you meant here or presenting your case in a different manner - I'm just asking for furhter explanation. You're actually autistic and lack comprehension skills.

It's quite obvious you have comprehension issues due to your self-admitted head injury in the past and not interacting with people outside this discord

@Fuzzy Balls It was about the actual definition, not the reasons why people have sex or what can the consequences be.. Another pseudointellectual?

https://i.imgur.com/E4LMAEp.jpg

^ mentally ill

@Phasor Could you ban this weirdo? He's been spamming nonsense for the past week

dont need anyone to save me nigger

we just need a cure to save virus like u

k nigger

Michael, this guy is a lunatic

His vocabulary is rather small so enjoy being called a nazi

Dems taking over LOL, nice joke loser

For a racist trump, as you claim, his black approval rate has been higher than ever

He's not going away anytime soon

so enjoy, loser 😉

He IS and WILL be the president of USA 😉

Good job!

>Comes to discord dedicated to Trump

>Blocks people that support Trump

>Keeps on spamming

>Tottaly sane confirmed

So triggered 😦

This lunatic is funny

FractalGuuise is a troll

I'm convinced

Tried to reason with him but then figured out he's a troll

Yeah, mental illness is inherited among liberals

@Phasor

@Phasor

@Phasor

Documents Link Putin’s ‘Favorite’ Oligarch and Obama Official Who Aided Author of Anti-Trump Dossier: https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/12/documents-link-putins-favorite-oligarch-obama-official-aided-anti-trump-dossier/ I wonder where is it... I'm not buying the "theyre waiting on the IG report cuz Special counsel could get the IG report early.

Also why cry about it now, sore loser? https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/14/obama-russia-election-interference-241547
"POLITICO spoke with more than a dozen current and former officials from across the national security spectrum, including intelligence agencies, the State Department and the Pentagon. Almost all said they were aware of Russia’s aggressive cyberespionage and disinformation campaigns — especially after the dramatic Russian attempt to hack Ukrainian elections in 2014 — but felt that either the White House or key agencies were unwilling to act forcefully to counter the Russian actions."

My guess is that Mueller & Rosenstein will not be pursing the criminal case through this treaty, as they already know their evidence is based entirely on rumor and therefore useless in any proof-based courtroom. And at that point I would hope Trump would fire both Mueller and Rosenstein, as they will have proven beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt their entire investigation has been based on a partisan political attack against Trump, and not on any due diligence in accord with a criminal case?

And Obama issued EO to let all spy agencies share info, right before inaguration.. On his way out, makes u think: https://www.engadget.com/2017/01/12/obama-expands-the-nsas-ability-to-share-data-with-other-agencie/

The DOJ's indictment for Lee was for HRC email indictments and his case was also burried by FBI (in DC) during Obama rea. Russia bought that data and used it to harm Americans
https://archive.is/RDvRP The case thankfully revved up this year with followin arrest. It was languished for “unclear reasons” in obama years.

This happened during Obama Administration
http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/07/13/gru.indictment.pdf Why didn't they do osmething about it? Obama was informed by the FBI in September, which was before Election. And they were clearly affiliated with Clinton Campaign. I wonder where was the DNC server and why FBI didnt take possesion of it. Even Putin accused them of doing it lmao. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Abq15axYtw8

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/06/15/justice-department-inspector-general-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-email-fbi-column/704815002/

Oh they said they DID interefe!!!!!!!!

greatest evidence alive

FBI is clearly biased. Anyone remembers lack of reporting on Obama-Hillary uranium deal scandal??? Even if we don't know a lot about the story, it shows complete lack of interest and bias from media, since the resources were there (Imagine if this was Trump) :
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-hillary-obama-russia-scandal-the-press-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about/
"According to documents unearthed by the news outlet, in 2009 the FBI had uncovered evidence of a sweeping, illegal Russian scheme to boost Vladimir Putin's atomic energy business, which included bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering. The FBI had also obtained an eyewitness account that Russian nuclear officials "had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit (the Clinton Foundation)." While the FBI was learning about these illegal Russian activities, Russia's state-owned nuclear company Rosatom was trying to acquire mining rights to 20% of the uranium in the United States through its purchase of Canadian-based Uranium One. To do so, they needed to get approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. Sitting on that committee were Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder. In 2010, the committee unanimously APPROVED the sale of Uranium One to the Russian nuclear company. In other words, while top Obama administration officials were deciding whether to hand over control of one-fifth of the nation's uranium supplies to Russia, the FBI had piles of evidence that officials at Rosatom were flagrantly violating U.S. laws and possibly compromising national security. The FBI also had evidence that officials had directed millions of dollars to Hillary Clinton's family charity, creating a clear conflict of interest.

Documents Link Putin’s ‘Favorite’ Oligarch and Obama Official Who Aided Author of Anti-Trump Dossier
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/12/documents-link-putins-favorite-oligarch-obama-official-aided-anti-trump-dossier/

I just explained it lmfao, it happened and was reported.

It's not out of context at all. Shwos clear bias. What more do you want?

You havent provided ANY evidence whatsoever

burden of proof is on YOU.

the only EVIDENCE you have is appeal to "authority" which is : FBI said X.

And this is baseless argument.

True

leaked text messages show extensive communication between a Russia-connected lawyer and Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. The attorney, Adam Waldman, was a paid lobbyist for Deripaska: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/08/democratic-sen-mark-warner-texted-with-russian-oligarch-lobbyist-in-effort-to-contact-dossier-author-christopher-steele.html

The messages show Warner attempted to arrange a meeting with Steele through Waldman

The Steele dossier was reportedly utilized by the FBI in part to conduct its probe into Trump over unsubstantiated claims of collusion with Russia... so no bias WHATSOEVER.

according to the memo, the FBI and DOJ failed to inform the FISA court of the following (https://www.axios.com/read-nunes-memo-fbi-doj-fisa-mueller-7fb8bcb7-1f18-4294-aa95-628d2f67bcdf.html) : 1) That Steele’s Dossier was reportedly funded by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) via the Perkins Coie law firm. “Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior and FBI officials,” the memo states.
2) That the initial application notes Steele worked for a “named U.S. person” but does not name the controversial firm Fusion GPS or its founder Glenn Simpson.
3) That Steele reportedly met with Yahoo News at the direction of Fusion GPS. A Yahoo News article about an alleged trip by Page to Moscow was cited in the FISA warrant, according to the memo.

Lmao, yeah they JUST talked... Nothing have to do with Steele's Dossier getting funded by Hillary Clinton (conflict of interests) and Steele dossier utilizied by the FBI for their claims for Trump and Russia's collision.

What?

Notice how we're displaying all the evidence altho burden of proof is on him.

Want me to answer who is that US person?

Be more specific

maybe you'll have to do some hearing

reading*

xD

I'd hope, their investigation has ZERO credible evidence whatsoever - it's based on rumors.

Actually, I think they won't even be pursuing a criminal case in this treaty

Because they got no evidence

There is zero evidence

That the Russian messed with the elections in Trump's favor, infact let me get other source of some Russian spies getting funded by Clinton Campaign

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/07/13/gru.indictment.pdf

Speaking of FBI? The one that burried (in DC) the case for the DOJ's indictment for Lee, that was for HRC email indictments?

Evidence, evidence, evidence 😂 😂 😂 😂

From your bias FBI source?