Right, but I want to minimize the amount of BARs I take in my lifetime, and reciprocity would let you skip that

Seems like CA is the only state that DOESN'T let you do that

so you're stuck in CA forever unless you want to keep taking BARs

So you realize that'd mean you have to hop on a plane to another state just to take their BAR and then come back home right

assuming you pass, then it'd be an expensive move, hope you've got capital from working until then

whereas in most other states, they have reciprocity to save you this hassle

Well, the important thing is that I was right, i guess

So do the elite Sargon discords have the porn channels? Curious.

You know what, fun fact

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 only got through because the Supreme Court weaseled the Commerce Clause into it

Equal protection and Substantive Due Process in the 14th amendment explicitly didn't work

but the COMMERCE CLAUSE did

Which enables Congress to deal with interstate trade

Which sounds reasonable until you consider that if you run a restaurant and use any ingredients you bought from out of state, or you bought it from someone who bought it from out of state, you're considered engaging in interstate commerce

imagine running a grocery store

Effectively, EVERYONE is in the commerce clause

it's a blank check for Congress to mandate how business is done

The gravity of the abuse of that clause is lost on many people

So they HAD to go for religious discrimination in the cake case

If you grow weed and consume the weed, it's considered interstate commerce because it AFFECTS interstate commerce in that same way

But you know what's really fucking interesting?

If Congress wanted to, it could say that illegals affect interstate commerce and any business that sells or hires them is going to be subject to heavy fines or something like that

Of course, they DON'T want to, but it'd be literally the easiest way to take care of the problem

Illegals would self-deport

Yes, but Congress didn't do anything under the commerce clause with this

basically, California's right as a state is a bullshit argument; Congress can do whatever the fuck it wants

But suddenly Leftists talk about state's rights

Irrelevant

Uh, you fine them when you find out

and you establish apparati for checking, over the state's objections

Congress can do anything it fucking WANTS

under the Commerce Clause

Boy if I were a reporter I would love to screencap this discord's convos and make an article out of it

Then they'd lobby discord to shut it down

any American lawyers in the house?

I need some motivation for the MPRE, I took Ethics and this shit is fucking dry

Didja guys know that in California, up until the last few months, you could fuck your client and it's not an ethical violation? California was the only state that allowed that

Nothing, I'm just studying for the MPRE and it's dry. I'm not sure how much I'm retaining anymore

I passed Ethics easily, but the MPRE is apparently different

As far as I know, they just add judicial codes?

The MPRE is the ethical test for lawyers

So I've been dealing with Chris Ray Gun fans on Twitter who think the Gunn firing was a bad thing

Does anyone actually think responding to the left-wing mobs in kind is a bad idea here?

The rules of engagement are set; the left-wing nuts have been mobilizing lynch mobs to claim wrongthink scalps for a long time. Turnabout is fair play

So if someone keeps punching you in the face, do you allow them to keep doing so unchecked?

Do you not punch back?

So it's only okay with physical confrontations? Well, all right, look at it this way - you're holding the opponent to their own standards. how about that?

Think of the Roseanne circus - Gunn supported the Roseanne firing. His OWN STANDARD was used against him.

If you can't hold the enemy to their OWN RULES OF ENGAGEMENT, what the hell are you supposed to do? Attain victory by surrendering?

Roy Moore was 100% innocent. A partially forged yearbook and some personal testimony, including one set forward by Gloria Allred, are all there was on him.

I'm surprised, even Sargon agrees with my sentiment here

But he agrees.

"i wouldn't even rape you"

And I'm still saying turnabout is fair play, so I don't see the "gotcha" here.

I agree, Hazzard

Also, remaining "civilized" for the Right meant for years that the Left were awarded free scalps

I'm going to reject that state of affairs.

It's kind of like how feminists expect men to roll over and give them an advantage in the workplace, as Sargon as spoken of many times: the men should tell the feminists to get fucked and deal with the world they created

^

Sargon was absolutely right in his Avatar video about the Gunn matter - the Right is WELL WITHIN their rights to fire back.

That it took so long is frankly a testatement to saintly patience.

i have no frame of reference for that

But I will say that I think turnabout is fair play if there are no other viable alternatives to fight back, and I don't see one for the Right other than letting more Roseannes get lynched

I think Joy Reid gets away with it because she's not white

Muh Russia bots

ben shapiro at full speed sounds like a Never Trumper...oh right, you guys are liberals nvm

Nothing, they're both probably full of shit, because Trump is doing a magnificent job and all of his critics have been proven wrong at every turn

But as for Ben Shapiro, he literally said he stands with Never Trump

It's bullshit.

Q is bullshit, fight me

"Here's some vague nonsense you can twist into something meaningful, enjoy"

Erm, didn't Q come from 4chan?

and what, I can't state my opinion on the matter? That's fine

I don't even know what that means

What clearance do you think Q has?

Well, it is a larp, yes

Can any of you nerds do me a favor and point me to a video where Sargon explains his "I wouldn't even rape you" comment so I can forward it to someone?

I don't know where to look, but I've seen him very precisely explain the trap he set with that comment

That got me 3 reddit posts, a "Feminist Analysis", and Leftist youtube channels

Whatever, I got the Thomas Smith debate - I was just wondering if he had a more concise explanation for who im forwarding it to for digestibility

There's significant context I want made clear

Which is fine, the Thomas Smith debate does it in a roundabout way

I just wanted a clip of Sargon himself explaining that, because I know he did. It's fine, the guy I forwarded the Smith debate to ignored it anyway

Fellow Americans or Californians - what resource do you use to decide what judicial nominees to approve? My only option seems to be searching them individually.

My ballot has like 10 people to approve

Nope

Otherwise i'd go pure Republican

That's a lot of stuff to sift through, I'd have to find out their general judicial posture on various issues just by examining a pattern of how they've ruled and why they've ruled that way

I still get the choice of saying "Yes" confirm or "No"

I would vote for a literal no one over any Democrat at this point

Hey, fellow Californians - how's it feel to look at our Senator picks and see Dianne Feinstein or Kevin DeLeon?

Now that's a tough one. You got the Senator from Beijing versus Dude who Admitted Half his Family is Illegal Aliens

Obviously, but I can't just go like "No" to each judge

But I don't want to literally research their case history

I can't tell if it'd be safer to keep Dianne or go with Kevin

lol a write in wouldnt win

So I have to pick between Chinese Spy and Illegal alien Accomplice

Also, okay, I found a great system for deciding judge picks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leondra_Kruger

"former Obama official"

That's a no