Should point out, I don't use Tinder, but I've seen enough consensus on the ways it's good and bad for guys specifically, and also consensus on things that make you more likely to match with someone

It shows we've progressed as a society, I'd say

> I mean you don't really rape your significant other
It could still be considered rape if one or more of you are drunk, regardless of how close you are to e/o

@!GPT what I said?

Cognitive ability is the factor in deciding rape, and it's not tied to whether or not your partner is an s/o

I thought "dyke" was originally a slur specifically for lesbians

Either way, definitely not "more appropriate"

Neither was "fag"

@Ben❤ from what I've seen, dyke was used specifically for lesbians

I agree on "fag"

though I feel like "fag" almost exclusively happens in situations where insecure men are talking down to gay guys, but women are probably called it too

@Mr Ehrmantraut jeesh not this again

lol

He's not a troll, I talked to him yesterday and we had some conversations that weren't just trolling
I think

tbf when I was talking there were about 15,869 people talking over each other to respond to me so it was a bit hard to thin out the crowd

(yesterday)

_sounds like something a troll would say_

I'd keep him

uh not quite

Poe's Law is more like, if you don't indicate that you're trolling, it doesn't count if you're trolling other people, basically, because they won't be able to tell the difference

He's not a troll, we had a lengthy discussion about chromosomes and whether or not he's a gay man

Clearly he believes in the multiverse

And a gay man at that

no one will understand that except for us lol

though sheeple might, I can't remember if he was there

Meritocracy can exist on multiple levels, it can exist in job systems in the US, even, to some extent

@Jonahstormrider with that logic, you have no reason to believe China exists, unless you've been there

How do you know about that history, were you there? Did you perceive it with your senses?

Sure and that means you can carve away literally anything anyone has ever told you about anything, if you never directly perceived it with your own senses

It's like one step below total solipsism

Like, how should we be able to say Genghis Khan exists, for example

I would guess Citizen Z

Not currently

I know it's not ideal

Is that really your take?

So you see the word "England" in two different historical contexts and think there's no way the US could be compatible with both?

How do you know it's the same England, as in, the same people? The same values being discussed between the two countries?

I'm not familiar with the bar

Mm ok I've heard the term

Well, not really necessarily. That's like basically saying, if we borrow some things to run our country from another country that we split off from, then we're not "truly" separated from them. As if we need totally different values and everything to be completely free from them.

So we may as well basically throw out the entire Enlightment value system we try to adopt

Also, we can throw out all those federalist buildings in DC because of their Greek influence, we wouldn't want any of that considering how Greece's economy is doing

That's the logic I'm getting here

Do you have a source on this BAR organization?

That's an internet Q and A

lol

State's rights...to own slaves