Tim calls himself a fence sitter but he's clearly on one side. He's just stumbling close enough all the time that he might fall over it at any time

and thats why i still watch

i want to be there to see that moment

heh, or Clinton

He can absolutely stay on his side for all i care. He's just leaned over the fence enough times that i think it's going to happen, or his soul is broken and he gives up on politics as a whole.

GIMP, Paint Tool SAI

That said i'm a locked down adobe guy myself. I'm trying to leave, but my habits won't let me.

Introspection, or self destruction

Oh there will be

THERE WILL BE

A people who've been trying to kill everyone else it comes in contact with long before the US even existed. Theres really only one message you can send.

The US keeps failing at this because they stopped fighting properly after Korea. They just topple and install and topple and install.

no but now that they are involved...

my criticism of the US and most western foreign policy is mainly this.

Don't get involved. If you fail to keep your hands to yourself, at the very least do it right.

an american might prefer that

but lets be honest here a lot of the world thinks they'd like that but probably won't

The US is the douchebag older brother that gives you a nuggy every now and again, but that brother is also the reason why the neighborhood bullies don't fuck with you

as a person living in your country's "hat" i think anyone who has bothered to take a look around realizes that if the US collapses or retreats into an isolationist state, the world would immediately become a much more hostile place for a lot of us.

I never said they have good intentions

I said they're the reason worse people aren't fucking with you

good on ya, must be tough considering how likely you are to lose contact via a block with the progressives and marxists just for disagreeing.

why dubai?

ah, yes i always forget about that...or rather i always question why

> @Bringerof_D Hostile for "us" as in the US/Canada in particular? The only hostility comes from our actions. If our actions were not what they were there would be no reason to be hostile. If you mean the rest of the world in general if you truly think that (which I don't) its not our problem.
@Ϻ14ᛟ You should read up on some history from outside of the western sphere. Pretty much everyone in direct contact with an islamic nation has been facing continuous invasion and terrorism since it's creation and from the arab world before that.

effectively thats the reason why all current cultures in close proximity to Islam have very strict doctrines against dealing with them. All the other ones don't exist anymore.

Actually @Ϻ14ᛟ fighting over there serves a great benefit. It means they don't get the chance to fight over here.

or at least reduces the fighting over here

might?

i think we can very definiteively say they have. Or have we forgotten every islamic attack before 2001?

every hostage taking? suicide bombing?

embassy attacks?

the fact that europe was mostly became islamic territory until the first crusade pushed them out again?

and like i said thats the fault of US strategies since korea

i'd say it's a fault whether they wanted it or not, or do you think this kind of strategy has been beneficial to the rest of the world?

and there it is the jews are involved

i don't care for them but come on. The only annexation they've done was in response to everyone around them attacking at once.

As far as i'm concerned if you inavde a neighboring country and they beat you and seize some ground, it's fair game.

you're right about that, they didn't belong there. But they do now

I for one would love to find my own Enkidu

@Jym i wasn't talking about the weeb version but ok i guess

@Jym huh, cant believe i didn't remember that bit about the river.

Trump has his ability to rouse a crowd thats for sure

not sure about policy and beliefs though

As mentioned before i'm sure a lot of us are the same in that regard

but once you are involved, you can't just back out after a half assed fight.

I think the difference is how they divide the classes

i mean once more how do you define right wing?

@snake your interpretation can only be true if you consider race based division to be strictly right wing

and religious leanings

but the left also have a religion, or rather a pseudo religion and can definitely also be very racist

It's effectively the same thing, Communism and Facism, they just came up with different names and divided "us" and "them" with different metrics

the core philosophy is the same

@Ϻ14ᛟ yeah actually let me rephrase that