every single adult here knows that banning usury is plausible, but banning jews is not. insisting on non-viable political advocacy is fedposting

that being said, you might plausible induce a jew ban by first banning all the bad shit they do.

yep, banning porn is a great thing to do alongside banning usury

parents are the majority, and parents dont want their kids seeing that smut. another viable political planck

the (((courts))) are the ones protecting smut. if you attack smut, you make the (((courts))) look bad, and destroy their power. which helps us win. see how that works

<@225177396310048768> the actual facts are that people consistently vote against immigration. california passed a proposition against it that the courts struck down. we are being betrayed by an anti-democratic process of the judiciary. just like the money changers have to be expelled from the temple, so too do the lawyers and pharisees

most of the "woke" right is LARPing about further empowering the judiciary like propertardianism or lolbertarianism these days, but in reality the judiciary is where we got fucked. the people voted against all of this bullshit. the black robe fuckers and bankers screwed us, same it always was.

<@225177396310048768> you were saying white people consented to this. they didn't. an enthroned elite did this. your argument that it isn't the jews is therefore not valid. im not hung up on the jews either, but your arguments are still no good.

it is an objective fact that white people have more money than jews. you can go buy the media if you want

the things you are crying about are things you decided to be true

i'm in favor of deporting all marxists, nothing wrong with that. why stop at jewish marxists rather than naming the *entire* problem?

we can deport all the atheists too, im ok with that

are you also in favor of punishing all white people for things some white people did?

anyone know the name of forms that Vindman would've filled out to disclose the offers of defense secretary position made by ukraine?

i named them all chad for simplicity sake. call them all at once

Is it on planet Earth?

Is it a man made object?

Does it cost over $1000?

Is it made mostly of metal?

someone who knows about cars could probably take over better than me at this point

^ shifty

asking "is it a car" is a bad question. you are suppose to ask "is it an automobile" or something broad, so you can narrow down faster

you have to think abstract and then successively narrow

alright my turn. im thinking of something

no 1

2. no

an ambulance

yea thats why you have to say automobile or whateevr

3. yes

3. yes - made by man

4. not made of metal

5. not industrial

6. no

7. no

i picked a hard one

8. no

9. no, not for hunting rabbits

10. it is not a device

11. abstract concept - no.

12. no, it exists outside of fiction

13. yes you can see it

14. no not made of stone

15. no

true

we are psychologically profiling you based on the questions you ask

16. yes

17. yes

18. no

19. yes

20. no

2048 is the game i was thinking of, but i'd call that a win

good job narrowing in at the end

pretty sure judaism has infiltrated nicks mum

i think i know the (((answer)))

got 'em

any of you goys ever submitted a FOIA?

that tweet is really making the rounds

seen it many times in all kinds of places

@Cammel "But the fact remains: White America has an average IQ of 109. " how can this be true? there are like 99% white states with IQs of only 104 or 105 at best?

women with multiple children vote reasonably well. the problem is the sociopaths, barren / one child women

the constitutionality of the draft was ruled on by supreme court, and they found that the draft and the vote were inseparable: you have duties, and you get privileges. the problem with women's suffrage is they got the privilege with no duties. for a woman to vote, she should have to produce two or more children in wedlock and stay married until they are 18

no vote until 2nd child, and vote is forfeited if you divorce before all children are 18

men work for vagina. to the extent you don't spread vagina out to men, your useful workforce is destroyed

the way we spread it out is enforce monogamy

80% of men are not attractive to women. you can not have a functional society on the basis of 20% of men. you have to mandate the spreading of the vaginas

is he really a millionaire?

how do you make money playing video games for a few people?

does he get paid to be liberal apologist? is that it?

he is like a crypto-news anchor?

20 questions game anyone?

liberalism is the problem

>durrrr believe in lbieralism or ur a fed

jf's ears are lopsided. his headphones will look lopsided no matter what brand

democracy is nothing more than a mechanism to give authority to falsehoods

1 drop rule buddy

🤡 🌍

you guys see IG report?

apparently (((ivanka))) was pals with christopher steele. lmao

very autistic in here today

@Str3tch I've felt like most reddit content was bot generated for a few years now. Maybe not "most" but at least all the top voted stuff. If you go to some sub with no traffic and the bottom of a thread you can find humans.

You know back when reddit posted usage statistics their two most trafficked cities were Eglin AFB (home of US propaganda unit) and some tiny random city in IL that turns out to be corporate headquarters of a bunch of places

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/124304784466378752/631350607781036062/alexjones.mp4