http://brainbutter.com.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Visual-Auditory-Kinaesthetic-.pdf

i like pretty titties does that make me a nazi

sounds like i need to consume more soy

Another example of potential misunderstanding: it was stressed that findings from a recent metaanalysis and subsequently published studies show that neither isoflavone supplements nor isoflavone-rich soy products affect serum testosterone or estrogen levels in men, which according to the context was meant as a proof for the absence of feminizing effects [36], [39]. In a case report on gynecomastia associated with soy consumption by a man it was noted that after the patient stopped consuming soy products, ‘his breast tenderness resolved and his estradiol concentration slowly returned to normal’ [33]. It should be commented that, being estrogen analogues, phytoestrogens may exert estrogenic effects on their own independently of the levels of endogenous hormones.

source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270274/

the jury is very much out of on soy

i think he should stand trial for rape

he ran the clock out on those charges which i feel is a miscarriage of justice

also if he had worked with state department and redacted certain pieces of info I think all of this would be a lot less severe

but he put his middle finger up claiming he was too busy

so fuck em chickens came home to roost

also assassinating snowden on foreign soil would be problematic but nobody has the balls to call out russia for similiar practices so i highly doubt anyone would give fuck

u guys should stop feeding the troll

itll get bored

and go back to its bridge

okay

trump odds at +160

still good odds put down a 100 take away 260

was insanely good before the biden debacle

too real

ur gonna hurt zers feeling

transexualism is a myth change my mind

im typing tho

oo sanpe going to jail

BIG TIME HOPE HE BOUGHT EXPRESS VPN PROMO CODE SHAPIRO

PROMO CODE PROMO CODE

buy bottles of bleach promo code sanpe

@Sanpe

@Sanpe

@Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe

@Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe

@Sanpe @Sanpe @Sanpe

u can mute channels in discord

fyi

not the best solutiojn

@Sanpe

to pop a notification

for him

😃

if u say so

hell get a good plea deal

because a court proceeding would expose classified information

if they dont then hell plead not guilty

and then risk state secrets being exposed

which i hope will happen

cuz im 20 minutes from the courthouse

and it would be hella interesting

bit hyperbolic id celebrate him before clinton

least he doesn't have a mountain of skulls

wikileaks is apropaganda arm of the kremlin

its utility is to sew discord

and is remarkably effective

thought we were getting pics..

"cuck norris"

thats not true

a murderer

wrote a letter to the family

and got tried again

because new evidence surfaced

the letter

cant be treied with the same evidence again

but if new evidence arised

fair game

just look at it as a cracked out haikou

the letter provided additional details pertaining to the case

if additional evidence arises they can be prosecuted again for the same exact crime

motive means and opportunity!

and if i accidently run over a baby running across the street. its not the same as if i pull on the curb and run over a baby on purpose

either way the baby is dead

but the crime is different

intent is paramount in determining the degree of justice ( sentencing)

if a crime is foiled what would they be charged with?

attempted =/ intent is what ur suggesting?

id argue attempt suggests intent

i see what your saying

hate crime is weird is general

legally speaking

cuz a lot of that is subjective

taht i dont follow

because u can be exonerated of murder and still be charged with manslaughter

for the same incident

yea i happen to agree with that guy, its more of a first amendment issue then 5th

u cant be asked to prove a negative

its the onus of the prosecution to prove it was

and our legal system is not black and white, the judge and jurors are typically pretty savvy

lots of ways, but im not here to do a hypothetical prosecutors job for them!

chances are u wouldn't be selected then. and a collective body of 12 people discussing facts is smarter then the average bear

you aren't gonna convince me based on anecdote!

id rather have jurors then arbiters of justice

I think alot of it has to do with our attempt to punish things we find detestable, like killing a black dude cuz hes a black dude. I would argue their is a delineation between that and killing a black dude for fucking ur wife- its not cuz hes black its cuz his cock is in ur wife

and hate crime laws are trying to account for that delineation

its a reductive response and i dont want to discount the merit of your argument. Which i gathered as an ideology should not be punishable by law, which is what that video alluded to. I can totally see the argument where it infringes upon the first amendment.

i guess i should have worded it better to account for the premise. If u walked into in a killed him yea, but say u discovered the pattern and made the decision to end his life.

a for useful scenario would be remorse in criminal procedings, in sentencing a judge will account for the defendants attitude towards a crime. if the defendant does not see what they did as wrong we treat it differently then if they show genuine remorse and understanding. in this scenario you would be punishing to sociopathic tendencies or ideology that what they did was justified.

the important word in the concept of criminal justice is justice

The system is meant to serve justice. which Intent can and is used to determine what is required of the system.

so say you put pig bloods on a mosques door handle. without ideology involved it would be a simple vandalism

this is where the concept of hate crime, ideology, and intent would come into factors.

yea but mussies touching pigs blood condemns them to hell

in their ideology so its seen as a more obscene gesture then vandalism