I don't like trump

Or Hillary

I'm interested in debating people who do

(Btw I'm not one of those cringy bastards who say trump is a nazi)

It wasn't intended to be an argument,it was a statement

They are both proponents of the state and propagate it's continued existence

And therefore they both propogate institutionalised violence,coercion and private property violations

I have a spine forged from the molten steel that is being deeply immersed in the political sphere of the globe for over 2 years, i can assure you it is quite strong

@qatal zanjiun

Is anyone gonna debate me?

Lmfao

@qatal zanjiun because even the literal definition of a state is "a monopoly on the legitimate use of force in a certain geographical area"

I don't see the violence as legitimate,some do,either way it's violence

@Deleted User nice,vc?

Magnitsky act?

trump is just a puppet of the international bankers

But ok

Watch " all wars are bankers wars " on YouTube

Lol

So legitimate quotes from various bankers and historical evidence is "fake news"?

i agree there is a smear campaign against trump however calling any and all legitimate evidence of wrongdoing or otherwise presented "fake news" is juset stupid

@Grucifer lmfao

"any evidence contrary to what i believe is fake"

Lmfao

I'm not a regressive but ok

"if u disagree with me in any way your just another libtard who hates trump reeeeeee"

Lmfao

anyone can,however that's why evidence has to be certified etc.

@fghjk i am,the federal reserve exists and trump has made no move to abolish it

and the only presidents who have made attempts to do so ,lincoln and jfk, were shot

The federal reserve is worse

Sir Winston Churchill even admitted in a private telegram to FDR that ww2 was for economic reasons

To "secure new markets" as he put it

There was even a plot to coup the US federal government concocted by multiple central bankers

It got exposed but nobody was prosecuted for it

Look up "the business plot"

@fghjk what?

@Grucifer the central banks started it actually, at the time they were mainly British and American

Google "nathan Rothschild"

the soviets were propped up by American business interests

The ford company specifically

For god sakes they even built a tank factory for the soviets

And gave them millions of dollars in financial aid for some "mysterious" reason

that factory they built you can go to the site of where it was

im saying American business interests did

For f*cks sake the engines used in the T-26 were ford designed!

thousands of Soviet tanks made with American designs

Millions upon millions of dollars given to the soviets years before the war even started

idc about that @fghjk tbh

why?

I've seen that already

I'm a student of history

@fghjk an influential american political figure

idc if he's lying or not,there's much bigger forces at work

Forces that are intertwined with this most likely

And?

What great significance does it have?

and?

Both countries are both in the world bank

Bank for international settlements*

ok,i really couldn't care

And?

Both countries are just puppets

of the bank for international settlements

I DON'T CARE

Lol

Just stahp

I'm not a conservative,im a voluntarist libertarian (a real libertarian,not the regressives)

no

An anarchist

I want voluntarism

No

They're statists

Im an anarchist

@Grucifer yes i am, u muricans use liberal to describe socialists n shit

😂

I use the terms in the traditional sense

@Grucifer I'm not triggered

It's just mildly annoying

And?

nq

Na

Oof

He's just a tough talking buffoon

But he's still better than hillary

Aaaaaaand that's 3

@Grucifer

drop the ban hammer

Lol

Lol

if private property norms are a state institution and cannot exist without the state, then there is no such thing as theft. If public property is natural and needs no state intervention to maintain, communism would be stateless at least once. The difference is the state offers license to own what you already own, public property cannot exist without tragedy of the commons and states rejecting homesteading of public property. If you allow private property owners to seek more than one form of protection, both limited public and private property can coexist without the overarching state body. Sure public property will never actually mean public property, it will only ever be a limited form of state, but at the very least, you know exactly what is expected because your protection agency cannot sell it out from under you.

I don't live in the US ,im 16 and I'm a voluntarist

Hello?

@Deleted User nvm,im in the server now

Hi

Ancap is better