imagine how many lamps you could light with all that blubber

Yes because its the religion that inherently helped create the western culture they loath so much

Pretty sure thats just six hundred and sixty six

To be fair @Salacious Swanky Cat its also a pretty far left thing to do, as per the Labour party in britain xd

Isn’t that what you’ve been doing for the past 30 minutes while someone brought up a question you still haven’t answered

Little do you know the beanie actually contains his consciousness

There isn’t a perfect form of economic structure, capitalism is just the most human nature aligned one there is.

~~probably because were all blabbing about other parts of capitalism and not the actual subject~~

She found something people apparently wanted and is exploiting it to the maximum extent. Sounds like a typical business to me.

Yes well, neither would it in mine, but regardless. The publics morality & ideas don’t necessarily align with any of us individuals.

So apparently people plan to storm area 51 on sept20

I can’t see that going very well

All these posts about what people will be leaving with in Area 51 when we all know they’ll be leaving this way

I think the less people that show up the more likely lethal force will be used

Because then its not going to be a massacre

If they get too big, they can just

No, just use the Active Denial system thats been in service since 2010

Afghanistan war

Its the 5g ray that causes you to feel a burning feeling

I don’t think if there is the law prepared for a raid on a military base

@wolfman1911 your thinking of the Long Range Acoustic Device

Similar appearance tho

Either one would do

The last time it was used in a riot situation seems to be 2017

The Womens march

& of course the department actually has to buy them so most big cities (like New York though they probably support antifa at this point so they’d never use it) probably have one or two in storage.

And funding the police to buy these things 😮 thats too far!

:0

idk they seem to be entrenched in the ideology hole.

Despite only making up 1.64% of the population, Japan makes more than 50% of the porn

Any two friends of the same gender in any movie ever
Sky News:

near ascendance with that ping

Xenophobic? Maybe theres a case. Racist? No.

Patriotic? Definitely 🇺🇸

https://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/images/5/51/Sniper_DominationEngineer04.wav

To be fair, so do Floridians ~~even more so because of the high humidity~~

“Evidence of” or should we say “manufactured, out of context, or completely false evidence of”

Ye, give a little leeway so they don’t immediately go into circular lockdown because “hurr durr I don’t talk to fascists”

I dunno if your being facetious when you say “After all, democrats understand the lived experiences of all people, including conservatives”

The youtube video version :)

Its usually near the beginning

Otherwise I dunno what to tell u

Because all humans are flawed and try and push their own beliefs.

The Father isn’t in control of an entire country, try having one father in a similar control situation as controlling an entire nation.

No, because a King doesn’t have a personal attachment to every single person in the empire so they would in turn not see the need all the time to necessarily care about them.

There is no evolutionary basis because no other species thinks like a human does, and doesn’t necessarily have the free will we have.

A father sees a need to care for the family because they are of a direct bloodline. This is the same for a den of lions or wolves, or a ant queen where only the alpha was allowed to breed.

Its impossible to form a bond with enough people for an entire country. As such your bound to exclude a certain group. Your also neglecting how a father figure is in charge of **children**, those who have to learn and grow still. Unlike a grown adult, who becomes more logical and as such skeptical.

And consider humanity’s shift through the ages to ever larger population centers.

Where it becomes at some point infeasible for just one tribal chief to control everything.

Its the system working as intended.

The president doesn’t make the laws.

The president is the enforcer of laws and a figurehead for the nation. His job never was to “get things done” but its made to be such a big deal because its just one person compared to hundreds of reps & senators.

The system was meant to put Congress, the states, ahead of one head figure.

Because then we get what happens in the early 1800’s where the states don’t have any reason to listen or to help each other.

They don’t need to help their fellow europeans. They are an island with plenty of poweron a national stage and can function on their own. Unlike say kansas, a landlocked state.

Anyways, great example of a modern monarchy, 🎊 North Korea 🎊

With a democracy you can civilly elect your dictator out of office in [x] amount of years. With a monarchy, your stuck with them until they die

So unless you plan on overthrowing them, enjoy your shitty leader.

Then its not a monarchy

At that point you might as well just let the people decide whose the best person for the job.

Well your suggesting an ideal even more archaic and had its time to shine than the current one.

A ceo is appointed by people who are elected by a board of directors.

Who are in turn elected by shareholders.

Only people putting money into the system can vote yes.

But that doesn’t change the fact that its still a democracy and not an autocracy.

And by extent I point to the fact that those systems eventually evolved into democracies, by force or not.

We don’t have many monarchs today. Britain was a great example of a state that morphed into a democratic one over time.

“please dont say all "citizens"”
Whats the problem with that? It the exact same as how CEO’s are elected and you seem fine with that.

So who should get the right to vote? Because then you get things like peasant revolts when you ignore groups. How fatherly of you.

I agree unceph, but a mandatory service won’t make you much less of an idiot politically. Maybe you’d make them more patriotic, maybe your just teaching them how to shoot people

Military service doesn’t teach politics

Ye

Who decides what is ultimately “going properly”

Im referencing what @tomhastherage was saying.

If not the general populace.

Kinda, yeah. You vote for the favorite product with your wallet, the companies try to win your wallet.

Because then you get into monopolies where a bunch of rich people get to decide everything and once again the poor get shit on.

Let me guess

“Social darwinism”

No. In a government, if your suggesting people should have more say than others based on wealth.

Yes and if your a shareholder, your part of the country. If everyone in a country is a shareholder, and not all shares are equal

Your dealing with masses of living space, not products though. You can’t just go out and make your own country because other people live there and as such have their own society.

Unless you have an army.

If your a person and don’t like the system you say “get out make your own”

"buh buh its only diverse when they are all our same ideology >:C"

How can satire be dead if real life is a satire

The “no tikis” really puts the icing on the cake

art

in its gas form it can kill people from burns

Stop pushing conspiracy theories >:C