Rubbin' in that nigger tax

increase in immigration and disease outbreaks are not uncommon. My guess is there is a correlation here: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/mumps-outbreak-texas-reaches-23-year-high/story?id=46774069&cid=share_facebook_widget

NLG perspective on current events and events going forward: https://www.nlg.org/legal-support-for-anti-fascist-action/

list of organizations, schools, and companies working together to push the "right = hate" narrative: https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/hatecrimes#hatecrime-coverage

welcome

@Tedium If he is at all interested in the truth, have him watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XExjrZxTdk

Also, you can point out that just as the founders of the US can be romanticized, or Ghando, or MLK jr. the inverse is true as well. i.e. Someone can be demonized.

Eitherway, your friend needs to split apart the demon version from the real man if he wants to discover the truth.

Also, if one accepts that the greatest counter initiative to communism has been Nat. Socialism, then it's no wonder why Nazis have been turned into a caricature of evil.

In contrast: If capitalism was so effective against communism, then it wouldn't have taken root in society today.

@FairUse WA what do you think of this line of thought? (((John))) was talking about America challenging natural order, specifically tribalism. https://twitter.com/real_vanguard/status/885650396378779648

Are you equating 'natural' with 'primitive' here?

@FairUse WA So, I'm looking at this from an evolutionary standpoint. The phenomenon called "tribalism" emerges from some of the oldest systems that make up our entire nervous system. So, if you're a white guy that walks into an auditorium packed with blacks, your eyes trigger your amygdala which fires of, "DEATH IMMINENT" message, i.e. Flight, fight, or freeze response. There is no amount of will power that can change this nervous system reaction because it fires off before you're even conscience to the situation. So, when Jon is talking about what we've created as being unnatural, I think he's referring to this sort of biological aspect of tribalism. In other words, Jon is claiming that in America we are conditioning (like Pavlov's bell) against this sort of tribalism. My point is that such a feat is impossible. At least not without genetic tampering -- breeding us with the other groups would be an example of such tampering.

By the way, very interesting point on the principled vs unprincipled dichotomy.

Fairuse, I'm certainly trying to understand your perspective a lot more. No man is omniscient, so I don't expect that from anyone. But we can work together to figure a lot out.

Yeah, I would definitely listen to an audio book on this. The chronology of events and connections you're expressing here are new to me.

some of them are bisexual. and the emerging gays take priest hood class?

re: tribalism. this is a very good read: http://www.newsweek.com/biologist-eo-wilson-why-humans-ants-need-tribe-64005

I think there is a communication break down between Riefen and FairUSE. Something could've been articulated better, but instead it was taken out of context and now we have ad hominems and egos getting involved.

I think FairUSE's point is that the Jewish order is one of homosexulity. It's goal is the preservation of such an order.

@Riefen I don't think the claims you're picking apart are the claims that were made. They've been tangled up in confusion, so please don't ask me to go scroll up and unravel the confusion. Just start the convo over.

or on another day

one oven and we can start making dindu muffins

According to TGSNT, many different races, including jewish, fought for the third reich

no, our enemy is entropy. Jews are just an obstacle

to the stars!

Two tribes occupying the same space won't work. Culture is an emergent phenomenon of a particular tribe. It is the aggregate of that groups temperament. Thus, 2 tribes in the same territory lead to one another trying to establish their tribes cultural norms, i.e. temperament. Given that temperaments are different, then conflict is inevitable. Example of temperament: If you're higher in disgust sensitivity, then you tend to lean right on the political spectrum.

So, since we're talking about Christmas. What if we do the Easter Egg thing, but with mini-present boxes all around different cities.

I don't know. Might just need to get mini-boxes and then just stick a bow on 'em

@Thomas Ryan https://www.papermart.com/deluxe-matte-finish-boxes/id=79320

@Riefen i think it said 24

If we do a huge order, I'm sure we can message them for a better discount, or maybe even find an online coupon

My lunch is blessed by the Fuhrer

Anyone know anything about this? The following message was a reply to the Suidlanders Emergency Fund graphic I did: https://twitter.com/rlhonoraryaryan/status/886099148415672320

Yeah, I think that's what they're going off of. He was a person who was helping the nogs, got redpilled, and then changed his tune to helping his people instead.

The way I see it, "Tribalism" is an abstraction of various biological systems. "Redpilling" is reference to some sort of stimuli that causes that system to kick in -- which drives people to rise up and fight. So, that implies there is some sort of stimuli that triggers the amygdala -- which controls the flight/fight/freeze response. Those who have already woken up to what's going on most likely have a higher sensititivy to perceiving threats, thus their amygdala will respond sooner to the same stimuli than others. In essence, were the sheep dogs that sniff out the wolves in sheep's clothing. And, right now there is basically a chain reaction flowing through the populace subsequently.

@Nathan TX using the big 5 personality traits, supposedly liberals are higher in openess.

Yeah, the science is right at this point from what I understand

Those that lean right have higher disgust sensitivity which is presumed to affect orderliness, under the conscientiousness category

That's why you see Hitler constantly pointing out how disgusted he is

Earlier pundits, especially on the left, thought this temperament was due to fear -- which we still see, hence all the labels like homophobia; islamophobia, etc

That's their bias about the way we think

Did some art work; Just got done doing physical therapy; and now shit posting

When are we taking Miami back?

^is that an Antifa dox info?

don't spam it all here.. 1 sec. Great work!

@BraeJager TX

Tupac's Mom:

You think there'd be any problem with me or someone with a sock account tweeting that pepe at this tweet? https://twitter.com/commietantric/status/886712424325419010

I expect an epic shitstorm to unfold if someone does

@here is there anyone with a sock account that's willing to tweet this pepe to #HappyBirthdayAssata

I don't want to risk compromising my only twitter account

thank you

let the chimp out begin!

@Thomas Ryan That one makes me think of ballet

https://www.queenslandballet.com.au/generated/images/seniorprogramhero_post_640x310.jpg

yes, ballet

They specialize in HCN production

no... I had to go for the joke

heart breaking though

I got held up by a black guy today. I gave him 2 G's but he was confused. I had to explain to him that 2 G's are needed to spell nigger, and that's why it doesn't pay to be illiterate.

<:reeeeeeee:318919743509889027>

^don't copy & pasta that anywhere.

@everyone are we doing anything to challenge the public claim by NJ that we're terrorist?

State of New Jersey

We need to

The longer it goes unchallenged, the more cause they have for it to have the illusion of truth. Our demand should be that a public apology be issued by NJ for villifying us for exercising our right of free speech.

Yes

But, @Thomas Ryan I ask leadership to comment on this. PM if need be.

If it's a positive claim issued by a government agency, it should be treated as serious. They have no authority to make "suggestive" gestures.

That's defamation. If they make the claim, the burden of proof is on them to establish their reasoning.

@Thomas Ryan here is one thing that needs to be challenged as well.

https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa?rq=antifa

https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/the-face-of-white-supremacy-in-2017

Not "someone". But a government agency should be challenged. MSM, ADL, SPLC, etc are all private organizations. They get plausible deniability by claiming, "That's our opinion." It's a cowardly move. But, they get to play with sophistry like that. Government, on the other hands, does not. They're bound to the rule of law -- which is a philosophical position. i.e. They're bound to logic and reason.

In order for them to make these claims, they have to substantiate their position.

For example: We are not a white supremacist group. White nationalists at best.

No sir, we would be challenging their claim in order to set the record straight. The burden of proof is on them to substantiate their claims.

They're calling us out.

Claim 1: "Traditional White Supremacist Organizations Attempt to “Rebrand” Re-stating claim 1: "New Generation of White Supremacists"

Claim 2 re our actions: "The group also placed racist fliers on religious and cultural institutions in New Jersey to intimidate minority populations."

Make a public statement in the news paper. A lawyer could answer this best. But, it has to be a formal outlet. In the past, people used to place notices in public-ations. And that would count as a formal notice. But, these rules change.

We do NOT have to respond to them directly. We just need to make a formal publication.

You pay for your notification to be printed.

How about this... (1) I'll write a response to the governments publication. You review it and change what you want. (2) We find where we need to post a formal publication to serve as a rebuttle to their claims.

Well, it'll at least show we're not hiding in the shadows.

10-4

@BraeJager TX We also played dummy ball. One brilliant game if you ask me.

yeah

helped me too

Have you guys seen this shit? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86PD8o6xe_4

way to go Fox!

@everyone In re to: https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/the-face-of-white-supremacy-in-2017 we have formed a response attached below. The intent is to publiclly, albeit cordially, challenge the NJOHSP's definition of our character in order to have them retract their statement while also correcting the public record as to why our organization exists. This is a first draft, so let us know if you have any questions or concerns:

yes

I don't want to present assumptions as to why we received that label. That's for the state to clarify their reasoning behind their claim.