neztharion
Discord ID: 255592525862010881
945 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/10
| Next
there are no subspecies of homo sapiens
homo sapien is literally a species of homo
all other species have died off
homo erectus etc
no
there's
1 race
homo sapien
1 species* sorry
not race
this isnt ideology this is the actual
basic science
there's only 1 human species left, homo sapien, there are no further species
all other species
such as homo neanderthalensis
have died off
there are no
subspecies
lool
there are no subspecies rofl
no they're not subspecies LMAO
he claims to know science rofl
we're the same species
homo sapien
you're just making things up
there's no subspecies
where are u getting this from
well its not the first time ive heard the pseudo-scientific claim, no
im wondering where your scientific basis in this belief is
?
do you realise that
homo erectus
is a subspecies
homo neanderthales
is a subspecies
?
these are the subspecies
they've died out
there's only 1 species left
yes.. do u know what subspecies means
okay, so
let me educate u
homo
is a species
homo erectus is a subspecies
homo sapien is a subspecies
homo neandertheles is a subspecies
only homo sapiens are left
this is
basic science here
lol
ROFL
yeah nice
pseudo-scientific chart
well no
because races don't account for genetic groupings
the theory of race predates our knowledge of genetics
and genetic groupings go beyond race
race is too broad of a category to efficiently group genetics
well, that's true, but they're not based on race
well, it might be a method for you but its an inefficient method, because genetic diversity exists within racial categories
this isnt dogma again this is basic genetics
genetics arent grouped by race
what you're saying isnt true because
you dont seem to understand that
genetics vary beyond physical appearance
africans dont all have the same genetic background
no, again
because race doesnt account for full genetic backgrounds
its an inefficient method
its too focused on appearance
so like
i can pull a person from south africa and a person from nigeria
they're the same race but
their genetics are vastly different
because of this
race is an inefficient method of grouping genetics
and serves only pseudo-science
this dude thought there were subspecies of homo sapiens.... lmao....
china black man this is why u dont talk to race realists they
are so so dumb
i think its a hammer smashing the hammer and sickle
its the fascist symbol
smashing the communist symbol
thats true
ya thats true
its a social tool
but when it comes to biology its rather meaningless
yeah being
a taiwanese-american is obviously part of his identity
its not really meaningful in biology as ive explained
the categorisation of race is too broad and ignorant of genetics to be useful in biology
again its not
dogma
there's too much genetic diversification
within races
for race to be a useful tool
in biology
i didnt say its meaningless
i obviously know
945 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/10
| Next