And again, strenghtening central rulers

But what is fascinating about Europe of the time, was it's sense of collective identity

Which was probably, and some will never recognize this, much thanks to Catholicism

I read the other day of a certain Portuguese missionary in India for example

or wherever that was

In what kind of racist terms he advised against letting "simple minded" aboriginal population advance into ranks of clergy

Considering their mind inferior to that of Europeans

And mind you, Portugal is on the very edge of Europe

The existence of a "center", which could be intuitively perceived, even with all obvious material realities in mind

Was as much of a blessing as it was a curse, due to later religious wars

Vargists will never appreciate this, because to them, any idea of Europeans moving anywhere beyond physical boundaries of Europe is a blasphemy

Because we be thals and shit

varg is silly

he does not know as much as he thinks

he thinks we b neanderthals

he got that entirely wrong and obviously did not research it much at all

everyone who is not a nigger is a neanderthal

neanderthals were all eurasians

cro magnon man aka early modern human aka nordic man is the origin of all whites

and presumably did not just spontaneously generate in the ural mountains but was derived from neanderthal precursors

don't assume that

people always see ideas like Varg's

and think "how dumb, it's obviously not that"

not realizing he has obviously already been through where THEY are in their "reasonableness"

and rejected it for real reasons

I have researched what he discusses quite a bit though

Vargs theory is entirely made o accommodate to his prejudices

that's another one

you look at a cro magnon skull and it looks like a Swede, and neanderthal skulls look like gooks

And his very shallow prejudice is that:

another reactionary response

I can even show it

1. All Europeans are native to Europe

if you start there, you will just find his prejudices in his stuff

yeah #1 is not even true

because you've already rejected what he has to say

2. And that Europeans could'nt have originaed or had anything to do with anything outside of Europe

they are native to central/western asia and moved to europe

which is dumb

this is the wrong approach, first you accept

only then can you really assess

fallot I know how to be intellectually honest

you don't

So he choose wich population is the most spread over Europe and concluded how that population is European

but this isn't about that

I would hear out varg entirely to find out if I liked his idea

or if it was true

it's not about intellectual "honesty"

https://namimc.org/male-borderline-personality-disorder-know/

I found this

Europe is by all logic

A conquered continent

And it's White population are it's conquerors

yes

there is lots of DNA evidence that nordic people are not european

And Scandinavia is the most White, because it was the most isolated from South-Eastern penetration of influences

and several pockets of fully nordic people with no european haplogroups

The direction of influences is not south-north

as Varg suggests

And Mediterannean people are not mixed with negroes

fallot FYI i feel quite physically miserable today, I basically woke up feeling like I was withdrawing from heroin

Becaue negro blood is highly invasive

incompatible with civilization

and above all

negro has expanded beyond sahara only in last 100 years

North Africa was White

Mediterannean was not the first line of contact with Africans

white as an norse?

North Africa was

like you would find scandinavians living in north africa?

I wonder what massive difference it makes to the hear and now, even if they had come from Africa?

Mediteranean was still shielded

White coloured people

However

koreans are white colored

Mediteranean obviously and certainly had contact with Levant

Which is why Mediteraneans are of darker hair complexity

I was under the impression meds were essentially part arabic/semite

basically western syrians and a little paler

and smarter

The evidence is before us today. It all kind of blends together from nation to nation

they are now, but what are "arabs/semites"?

where do they come from?

So direction of influences

Is not North-South

But rather

South-East, North-West

fallot - my impression is that middle eastern race was originally the intersection of trade for the whole earth

Negro in other words, never had contact with Europe, which Varg claims

there is no middle eastern race

and thus, continental indians, asians, europeans and africans would all have a mixing ground

From Asia?

so arabs do not exist?

Rather than Africa

they do, and are broadly the same caucasoid people as from ireland to india

there's a bit of negro admixture etc.

Yes, but Aryan people also entered and conquered Middle East, namely, Iran, Armenia, Hittian Empire

It would be obvious

"caucasoid"

depending on area