whats a low quality calorie

their shit is inferior

it's made of chopped up seal dicks, HFCS and bleached flour

is that like a low quality mile

it costs $2 here

so the article is objectively wrong and only an idiot would believe it

retards really think that is true

it's freakonomics

hahahahaah

i wish i could get that mad and defensive over a freakonomics jaunt

I am in medicine

aren't those guys like mega jews

yes

every retard is always bitching about how every other retard is unhealthy because shit food is cheap

they say abortion is justified for economics reasons

but they are wrong

they should be killed

adolf ackbar

abortion for economic reasons

not qualitative

just economics

I need to shut my computer off and give it a bath after reading that

@Deleted User 57835c2c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fYe3zFWvIg what do you think of this singer

well

first of all, before the age of widely available recorded music, singers were a lot better

this makes me want to listen to calypso

it took quite some time for the ability to sing good acoustically/live declined to how bad it is today

it took a solid generation at least

back in the 60s, compared to today everyone who sang at all could sing great

do you dance exilarch

would you dance the calypso with me

so before a certain point in history my only complaints are usually stylistic choices, not vocal talent

show it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C-DShN82mc

harry belafonte is pure brahmin

'in the 60s everyone could sing" - bob dylan

hahahahah

yeah not everyone

men especially were better singers

not everyone but compared to today

i understood the gist of what he was saying

people cannot sing for shit today

there was much more quality control

since recording was expensive

it's like 1 in 100 singers now who are even as good as the average singer a few decades ago

almost nobody in the 80s sang as bad as the singers we have now

and worse, the few people left doing clean vocals do it nigger style

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBASZodwgwg

for sure but even paul anka's version is worse and it came out the following year

hahahahahaha

paul anka good god

the women want to sound like some nigger mariah chick and the men want to sound like autotune dalits

i bet he was crushed on painkillers and booze trying to sing this one

Some mediocre singers of the era were great

do you get the feeling he was more manufactured

Dino for instance

than an actual good singer

Dino is great but not an exceptional singer

Just an average singer

With a great voice

And great music

Marty Robbins isn't the most technically competent musician but he was the superlative Western music singer

it didn't matter

Whereas Frankie Laine took his jazz singer skills to movie soundtracks

No, you can't hear Gunfighter Ballads and miss the point unless you're trying

the master's call is a club banger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjMNOouIb0k

then you get this

I need to find more singers I actually like

i don't understand what people are looking for in music if not The Master's Call

unless it's just soundtracks for eating sweat out of assholes

i think another bit

is how effortless it sounded

like he took you to the mountains

basically all the songs are journeys

outside of them being ballads

not like the kinds of variations you see in advanced metal

which song vry_o

but structurally it's there if you pay attention

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PajPwxuG9oI

this has more in common with reign in blood slayer

than it does garth brooks

which is pretty funny considering

the Don McLean guy sings good

real good

he sung that chipper song American Pie

that was him?

yes, that's his most popular song

he needs to stop sliding

..pretty much his only song in fact

if he simply fixed that one thing I'd give him 10/10

like... if we're actually going to talk singing for a sec, it boils down to this

there is classical singing, which is master race but is essentially technical rather than expressive

so all good singers fundamentally do the same thing as classical singers, but what defines them is their divergences in technique

@profagonist : http://medicalhypotheses.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/after-science-has-tradition-been-broken.html

in this guy's case he likes to slide a lot, as one major difference

so really when assessing a singer I basically ask, "does this person have the capacity for classical singing?" and if the answer is yes, "Do their divergences from it help or harm their sound/expression?"

and then there's little stuff like a person's natural timbre but I generally don't hold it against people

@Deleted User 57835c2c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE5sJy44s-Y what do you think about this guy?

this guy also keeps his soft palate a bit more tense to try to sound more like a tenor than a baritone

evidently a powerful singer, but makes choices i wouldn't think to