are about right

we're judging by maximum death per bullet

has anybody lined up some liberals to test this?

we know that liberals have softer, more spongey flesh than conservatives

might throw off the data a bit

at closer ranges lighter grains fly straighter and get better groups generally

and most militaries assume that their conflicts will be in close proximity

but that's silly imo

at what lux are these results tested in and at what ppi are you reading this info?

i just look at history of bullets

if i remeber correctly

because it could be misinformation below a certain lux

the .223 came from the .222

but how good are they at killing

@buckwheatclark how many liberals has your dad got buried in the back garden?

none 'yet'

are we talking at a ratio of 1 - 2 or lower

macmanera

or however you spell his name

came out with statistics

i know medium bullets kill at a minimum of 1.32 dead people per bullet squared

lol

that's silly

buck

yeah?

are your family still voting for trump?

yeah

dad thinks trump is controlled opposition though

but a .223 will kill a person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSE-XoVKaXg

it's not silly when you think about the populatoin of china, if you put them shoulder to shoulder, you'd be able to shoot and kill far more chineese people on average than any other humans densley packed together with medium sized rounds

@buckwheatclark Your dad might be right

but 1 .223 bullet is usually between 40-60 grains

.30-06 which is what we were talking about

starts at 120 grains

normal is 150 grains

how many grains in a clip though?

8 for m1 garand

so 8 x 150

yeah but the muzzle velocity of the bullet doesn't matter if you have 10 Square meters of people to shoot at

we need the nips to get back into imperialism

they did valuable killing chinks research

yeah it does

how many they can behead in a half an hour etc

what if they're 2000 yards away?

i said point blank earlier

oh

where are you getting 2000 yards from

in a magazine of .223

in a magazine of medium bullets

standard medium

not military medium

lol

both the .30-06 and the .223 are military

one is just antiquated though

fuck me i'm fucking with you i dont know about guns mate

lol

i'm austrralian, i just use my hands for killing

cheaper

Gary Johnson 2016

military figures that most shit is close range and requires lighter bullets to save money on the gun and the bullets

medium pedestrian hands are the same as military issue

i'm a fudd who hunts animals

but what lumens are they using in those tests

and animals have better senses than humans except eyes

i think lumens are precieved brightness?

luminous flux over a given area

so those tests can be wrong if they can't see the killing

killing?

yes

killing

from the medium bullets

our military keeps stats though

luminance stats on the killing records?

the UN had to come in and make sure the US wasn't executing people because there was so many head shots

probably in 0.0001 lux though

can make up anything in that luminance

>we killed them all

anyway

i know nothing about guns

i'm just fucking about

it's ok m8

i don't know too much either

i like to shoot though

do you know of any night vision goggles with a high ppi for @Camphor76-22-2 he's looking to start doing some night reading

there are 3 "generations" i believe

oh fuck dont give me a real answer

the first generation, which is what the chinks are probably selling to us for cheap

is dogshit

the secon generation which they also sell but is more expensive is OK

i'd rather buy US night vision if i had to fight though

the 3rd generation can really only be afforded by the military

unless you have $2000+ to drop

fuck

why am i regurgetating this info?

i told you not to

you're both as autistic as each other

it wasn't even a real question

i'd like to have one for one of my guns

but the scopes literally cost more than the gun