engineer a pathogen

Иди спи, Джеф

muy bien

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhx4koMPAWI

lol

expanded alphabet tho

quite nasal

thats why they are sending the meth outwards, i suppose

i would

captagon ftw

don't foget ure captagon before entering the assault truck

nice

ever been told you would be arrested by tactical anti terrorist squad trying to take your kid from school after its locked down and being swept for bombs cos of a jihadi email threat sent in the morning threatening a mass shooting? welcome to germany

i'd still be able to blow your bnoggin off with a pewpewneumatic air rifle if i used te corrrect diablos...glocks are from us bases and aks are from the eat but not wirht having them unless you bury them in the woods...cos its offically an occupied govt since 1946 intent on destroying this people

450 euros

its the eastern part of holocaust promotion land here...its really easy to get tooled up...dont know what is happening with that largest munition shipment in recorded history NATO boosted into their bases here earlier this year tho

guess its going towards kalingrad and crimea for the most part

you puppies lmao

oops

big fuck off pyramids and meteors..take shelter in the vatican catacombs

nah its a pig farm to help you guys joke about bacon

Q.E.D.

awesome video...container bombs are the new bomb vest,,,wait and see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTrBDJGySm0

>i can post some memes to insult you if you wish it

I DO WISH

@slack

"Clone factories would advance faster than computers. "@Firefly 👌 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W1aT8IsDKg

Welcome to /leftypol/ a low-moderation channel. Feel yourself free here.

Zionism is not the same as NatSoc. The content of Nationalism depends on the character of the people. Supremacy is not implied. For example Tibetan Nationalism is different than Jewish Nationalism. Zionism is definitely imperialist, racist, religious, bigoted according to the mythology of the jewish character. It is also possible for a NatSoc society to have the opposite characteristics of this. Primarily National Socialism is concerned with raising the consciousness of the people according to a specific mythological character. This can vary greatly.

What is the result?

No, that's Fascism. NatSoc can be pacifist.

The struggle is spiritual, not necessarily violent. Fascism is concerned with preservation. NatSoc may not care. It seems like a contradiction, but self-destruction can be apart of a mythology.

In this way the spiritually pure are immune from failure. NatSoc is devotional. Fascism is much more rigid in its victory conditions.

Zionism isn't Fascist either. It is simply Jewish Nationalism.

To me, this is why Lunacharsky's God-Building is so interesting. It attempts to create a mythology for the state just like NatSoc does. Lunacharsky however does not use religion as an ends it self, but dialectically as apart of the progress of humanity. In many ways this formation is superior to a National Socialist's approach, because it is more concerned reality with greater emphasis on the objective. It balances the utility and focus of Fascism with the strong values and vision of National Socialism.

It holds that the higher state of humanity has no need for religion but also provides a pathway to get there.

assuming the state is capable of religioncraft

which is always a mistake

You could say the same about the state running a fully socialist system.

I do so often.

It certainly hasn't happened yet.

But what if the state was fully capable?

lmfao

>what if the state was fully capable?

my fukin sides m8

have you ever met a bureaucrat?

they wouldnt know logos if they were run over by narcissus' rock

it could never actually happen

Answer the question. If the state was fully capable, what would you think of socialism then?

Stagnant.

It seems an ideology only supported by suppressing other ideologies.

I.E. this dialectic garbage

Does the truth suppress falsehood?

Logos arises, there's no other way to put it.

Do we? Are you making a naturalistic fallacy?

n=1

hahaa

if pedantry wasnt a feature we wouldnt be speaking in marxist terms

of course the socialists are grammar nazis, they're all english majors scared of being unable to produce in modern global capitalist society

so instead of sorting themselves out they push this gay ass marxist-leninist garbage through the colleges

Returning to my question. What would be bad about a fully capable socialist state?

Absolute cultural and social stagnation

Which would cause this state to be overthrown by a superior external entity,.

I believe that's how islam got fucked.

by roughly the marx playbook

What makes you think it would lead to stagnation?

There is no mechanism by which the people could be inspired to anything more than the state mandated minimum.

No reason to excel.

Except in corruption, and there's the second fatal flaw

if you're into the GIBS ME DAT

sure

but if you have an ounce of passion, you will turn it against this 'perfect' state

this is how humanity operates, they will break free of any cage.

if logos is present.

Logos?

which is why marxists sit around lying to each other.

EXACTLY NIGGER

no clue

no access to the meme stream

pls, educate yourself.

Do you understand the difference between IS and OUGHT?

lmfao

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAqPnK5-8WE

now, i wanna highlight here

the similarities between the composition of yakof smirnoff's act and the general thesis of marxism

There is a different between man lacking inspiration and whether he should lack inspiration. The state of man is not stagnant, but you are assuming it is.

HERE IS DIALECTIC ONE, NOW WE GO TO DIALECTIC TWO, PLEASE LAUGH

except instead of laughing, marxism teaches you to kill anyone better than you

its very devious

You are easily distracted. Is this common in your generation?

oh no, see, im not though

all of that, has a point

which you can only unlock if you have logos

you dont

still havent googled that shit

dumb nigger.

There are a dozen different contexts for logos. Being obtuse about it isn't clarifying your point.

right, because its not a part of your analytical method

thats the whole joke