```gravity blows```
fuguer, Internet Philosopher 2019

😄

gravity is more of an entropic/information concept than a force

it would take a lot of time to explain

Sounding like Gaede

nah this is all mainstream

thought the sun caused it (;

if the sun went away so does gravity i heard

Read this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.01198

I love the title lol.

i have a small understanding, being a science/IT undergrad in physics and computer science. but physics is way too mind blowing. i just do what they want me to do at uni without really grasping most of the stuff.

basically its like this..... in QM the more energy there is in a small area, the more ways there are for reactions and interactions to happen.

this density of possible configurations curves spacetime

because more things are possible, an object will seem "drawn" to the concentration of energy

because that's the most probable outcome

i.e. say there's 7 possible futures where the object gets close, and only 3 when it goes away

from what i've learned, you can pretty much just do an anova on any physics data and it gives you anything you need to know about the system. I'm not much of a modeler.

iterate this smoothly over time, you'll see an object fall smoothly towards energy

but to truly understand this, you have to blow apart your classical understanding of how time works,

get real confortable with spin statistics theorem of boson and fermions is a good start

yeah you can do anova

if you have enough data

its not as good as theory though

ill just stick to newtonian

i'm happy bending time. but i'm not so happy with ideas like cutting time in a place and reattaching it somewhere else. quantum physics is really unintuitive. i'm probably just a physics normie though.

usually we do permutations about a harmonic interval to evaluate the path intergral

we cant do the true intergral because its infinite

and save myself the headache that wil never pay off

to me it pays off because the purpose of life is to understand what i am, and the world i inhabit

at least for me

never lose that drive.

doesnt pay the bills though

yours isnt the end all either

yeah i recognize its my personal preference for how to live

its just a more complex model

very true

and not the real thing

i see what you mean

well yes, we can never prove we have the final model

i think we might be close honestly. QM is fantastically good the only flaw is its not background independent like GR

the final model is the universe itself.

Nothing we can invent can explain the real model, because it would be made up of parts of the real model

we need a model for QM where spacetime is emergent instead of baked in

whats M ?

you can't make it more simple without cutting corners and generalising.

the thing is QM is ridiculously simple

and it works everywhere but black holes

M for Mexican

To understand QM you need nothing more than basic linear algebra, basic calculus, and abstract algebra

yeah but i think qm is a general idea, it doesn't account for every single action at every point in time... i understand that sentence i just made can be broken apart easily though .lol

but theres always deeper layers

can you explain what you mean by that

it can explain almost everything, it just cant predict all outcomes

basically we need better resolution at smaller scales to really see what's happening. qm is predictive, but not an exact model of reality.

the biggest problem is QM treats time and space as absolute, when we know theyre not

theyre emergent

we dont need better resolution.... QM is an exact model of reality or very close

We don't really go smaller anymore. We get more abstract to account for different cases and observations.

yeah VERY close.

JQM

the fuzziness of quantum predictions is a consequence of our inability to measure exact quantum states

and the reason we cant is because there's no operator for them

das tru

an operator is a hermitian matrix you can multiply the wavefunction by to obtain a measurement

das rite

hermitian is a fancy way of saying symmetric matrix when the matrixes are complex valued

tru

yes.

W = wavefunction, P = position operator. WxP = observed position of particle

uhuh

The reason we have uncertainty principle is because matrixes dont always commute

meaning that W x P x M != W x M x P (M = momentum operator)

What is the result of a quantum calculation?

WPM != WMP

Like what kind of thing do you get?

a quantum calculation is just multipying complex valued matrices

and you get a number

bait a likelihood

i honestly believe if we could slow down time enough we could see quantum jumping in action. it's just too fast for us to measure. hence the resolution issue again. i think my brain is way too ingrained with the classical model. I feel there needs to be a progression, that it doesn't just go *poof* and the particle has changed state.

a probability

of observing the particle at that location

Here's what I think.... the jumping is all there is because time isnt continuous

if it more than half . its 1

jew physics

what we perceive as time is just the connectedness of different possible configurations

in the Hilbert space

picture all possible configurations laid out in a grid

yeah i can kind of imagine pockets where time curves around it or something. so we can't see the intermediate state. i dunno.

uhuh

connected by how many differences each configuration has

yes theres intermediate states that can never be observed those are virtual particles in a feynman diagram

`quantum judaism`

honestly if jews stick to STEM im happy for them

better than subverting society

judeo negro quantum scamming

lol subverting reality

gib quantum grants

nah i have no qualms with feynman, that guy was golden. i've read some of his books.

a virtual particle is one that isnt observed its interior on the feynman diagram