?warn @hhh shitposting in the wrong channel

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***old people#5821 has been warned.***

@Doctor Anon you don good

the damn staff never watch chats

I just had a person tell me in another server that a republic is apperantlya form of gov and not a system of gov

and im like

"excuse me what the fuck, arent those interchangable"

No care gaylord! <:hmmm:459545659972911114>

No because the form is how it is set up while the system is the way it is set up @L0GAN

@Doctor Anon do you see a difference in what he just said?

woah

oh i get it

the government is created by the form and is a system

i really dont see the difference

we need like an r/whooosh in here

seems like semantics imo

There is none really

its just different phrasing

theyre still the exact same thing

@L0GAN I don't know how you can separate the two in reality so it doesn't matter unless you are getting all philosophical

I would say it would be better described as theyre are different forms for each ***type*** of government

the term system is too broad

QOTD: are traps gay ?

yes

Yes

are gays traps?

🤔

Traps are very gay

yes

Traps are gay.

Obv they are

<@&479643036951904267> Daily Question:
In a one on one conflict would the United States or China come out the victor?

China

Unfortunately

They got the first world by the balls

If it was US AND Europe, then they might have a good chance

US only though... err... not really

china

Unless you mean a small trade war that is

But not a long term full scale economic conflict

a literal war

between the 2

china wins

no problem

**cough cough us has more nukes**

Russia got more nukes

And better ones

Your point?

lmao

russia got cold war shit nukes

Well i mean if America navally invaded China i would imagine it would be comparable to Vietnam.
Same goes for China invading US mainland

@Enclave In a hypothetical non-nuclear war it's gonna end up in a draw, but the US would be on the offensive as China's military is pathetic.

Plus, superior US tech, military and otherwise

if china wins we will see the UCSA

@Euro-American Bandit Nah China would stand their ground just fine, no chance of an invasion of any kind, just some bombs or maybe not even that

It would be 100% sea warfare really

True

which sounds beautifull

Unless the US had the whole world as ally or something

Or at least India as to allow for land war

it really depends on who the aggresor is

since nato

n shizz

ALSO GET OUT OF HERE

UNITED COMMUNIST STATES OF AMERICA

USA USA USA USA USA USA USA

No. I doubt the Chinese would force the US to become Communist (which lets be honest China dumped some of the economics of that ideology a few years ago)

On one side there'd be the US, Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, India (probably), some of south asia, and a few more here and there

Oh and Saudi Arabia

UCSA UCSA UCSA UCSA

And the vast majority of Americans would not accept a Communistic ruler

@Euro-American Bandit They still got lots of public industry. They're still communist to an extent.

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU COMMIE FUCKER

they accepted that shit fascist trump

@Euro-American Bandit Whoever wins wins, but no country could invade another of that magnitude with conventional weaponry.

@Enclave Fascist my ass

>Trump
>Fascist
He's at best a Paleo Con. At worse a Neo Con

he is a populist if anything

And even then that's questionable
I.e. Missiles in Syria

I mean

I'm all for the missile strikes in Syria

They were manufacturing chemical weapons in there, apparently

trump is a fascist

and racist

Shutup

puts kids in cages

Shut

The

Fuck

Up

😄

can't handle the truth trump fan boie ?

>the truth

Define fascism

Gay lord

trump puts kids in cages

So did obama

authoritarianism

with a mix of nationalism

That was an existing policy