You are the child who evaded debate again

@L0GAN link me in DMs

This entire conversation highlights your shit personality and why almost no one irl or online can tolerate you

u don't fucking know her irl

She’s a chubby smug autist

Doesn’t take much guesswork

you made two assumptions in that statement

why does that belong in <#452955229227319306>?

she deserves a beating

and no self respecting woman of reasonable attractiveness or healthy weight woudl behave like irma

who is she disobeying?

it's a matter of observation

the patriarchy

she behaves like a feminist yet claims to be anti feminist

Shut up @Deleted User that’s gross

also i would think no man with any amount of success would act the way you do and here you are

@Deleted User you’re just being gross now

good

any normal person would know that that's bad

boundaries are meant to be crossed by those with the wisdom to trample them when necessary

that was entirely unnecessary

I am serious about these beatings

ik and that's gross and bad

Dude stfu you’re just being a prick. Since he’s doing it in serious chat is that ban worthy? @Doctor Anon

i think a ban would be over the top

yfw @Griselda is @εïз irma εïз 's alt

<:hmmm:459545659972911114>

lol anyone who agrees with irma must be her

irma is a grotesque creature

most people cannot stand her

there is something seriously wrong with people who enjoy her presence

ur literally the only one that can't stand irma

and imagine complaining about race, and then giving yourself a "Wu-Tang" name *Zexy Ambassador*

Caught me im Irma

wrong @21tagtmeiern

so many people DM me to thank me for my attacks on irma

you remind me of a kid at my school

he says all of this unbelievable shit

and i just go along with it cause i can't call bs

you really think it's unbelievable that people dislike irma

and then i'm living in this weird hyperreality where i can't tell truth from fiction

she has an intolerable personality

@Griselda ?

u have a more intolerable personality

@Doctor Anon sorry for tagging you it was a joke

@Deleted User was just being an ass

And still is

You become the monsters you fight

oh @Deleted User you have a philosophy education right?

I at least retain some of my humanity

but it requires active introspection

but someone has to destroy the preening ignoramuses who think the internet has given them a podium to lecture on

@εïз irma εïз claims to be a traditionalist but has no respect for elders

imagine being a hotheaded 19 year old who thinks she has figured out the world and taking yourself seriously

no one has to destroy the preening ignoramuses

and yes I have a PhD in political philosophy

you just want to because u need to affirm ur arrogance

u know baudrillard?

absolutely

?warn @Deleted User 5,3,8

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***ostentatiousotter#3068 has been warned.***

cool can you explain some of that shit to me cause i'm confused

his work - despite being laden with obtuse terminology - is quite profound

are you referring to Simulation and Simulacra?

yeah i tried to read that

i think i mostly get it but i would like a more in-depth explanation cause i was only able to get it on a superficial level

It goes beyond the meta and into the para

i guess i would distill it down to saying that our cultural symbols no longer exist in their proper context

and the capitalist marketplace

This is beyond me I’m out

robs them even more so context

and our detachment from the context

while passing around these cultural artefacts leads us to generate new contexts

and then those contexts are mistranslated again

it's like the telephone game right?

creating simulacra and simulacras

yes, but he goes more into depth about how capitalism exacerbates this problem

his deconstruction of the Pompidou museum in Paris is a good example

oh the part i really don't get is his accelerationism

how is that supposed to work?

that part i would have to re-read

when i read it, it was between writing emails at my old work

and it just came off to me as "edgy for the sake of edgy

oh ok

because French philosophers took that path post Foucault

trying to out edge each other

idk if accelerationism is in simulacra and simulation or if he brings it up later

but maybe that's an unfair claim to put on Baudrillard

what he is saying is quite profound and recognisable in our society

he brings it up towards the end

he says that 9/11 is the greatest act of resistance

what does that mean?

you should just read that particular chapter

it's not long

ok i'll take another look at it

i think im going to buy a better translation of that text and re-read it

it's one i come back to alot in my mind

and it's not one that you can just read once and fully grasp