but Canada isnt a nuclear nation

South Africa had nuclear weapons until it turned out it was expensive and it hurt relations with other countries which hurt their trade.

or, Canada just hasnt picked a fight with every nation that looks at us

There is a direct correlation between soft power and the profit of exports.

I won't even try to understand that because it's definitely wrong.

That's not what we did lol

Iraq was invaded both times because they threatened regional security and ergo the import of cheap oil. Regional instability means higher import costs. That's why America is deployed fighting Afghanis but not defending the Rohingya people.

was it nuclear weapons? i thought it was nerve gas

America does not give a fuck about any country it invades.

It is never altruistic.

and oil

Iraq was alleged to have nuclear weapons by Israel who justifies their self-importance by claiming they saved America by bombing nuclear facilities in Iraq before the first Iraqi invasion.

not defending anything about Isreal

but that mission was fantastic

As well as other things such as regional support during the Cold War and the humiliation of Britain during the Suez Crisis which put America at the forefront of international prestige.

F-16s went in to bomb the power plant

The mission was fake.

they flew sub 400 AGL the whole way

Israel are Jews. Remember that.

We didn't literally invade to replace the leader lol

say want you want about Isreal, their military is legit

What country did Iraq invade before we invaded them and what was their primary export?

Answer me that please.

A K.

Kuwait's primary export is oil.

Regional stability is in the interest of cheap oil imports for the US.

Basic geopolitics.

You're just shitposting as a crutch for not knowing anything on the subject.

You didn't even know Kuwait started with a K until five seconds ago.

You do this every time.

You're a self-admitted troll and retard. It does not get any more transparent than this.

Well that is blatantly false.

I'm a nationalist socialist.

I'm not a Nazi.

I'm a nationalist socialist.

whats the difference?

doesnt nazi literally mean national socialist?

National Socialist was the name of the party.

They were nationalists but not socialists.

They more or less continued the social programs of the Weimar Republic except excluded Jews from them and started programs like the Lebensborn.

They privatized a lot of businesses and were in bed with industrialists.

Socialist? I think not.

why are you a natsoc

legit question

I'm not, I'm a nationalist and a socialist.

oof

I don't hate Jews as much as I hate gypsies.

I don't believe in ZOG either.

gypsies are the scum of the earth tbh

They're disgusting.

nomadic thieves

They're Dravidians who migrated from India.

they also treat animals like shit

They're intensely tribalistic and thieve from everybody that isn't them.

and leave a fuck ton of trash behind where they stay

They would be untouchables in India's caste system.

he ran the first anti smoking campaign

so yeah

he ran a anti smoking campaign*

he ran a large anti smoking campaign

hows tha t

Coincidentally didn't care if Jews smoked.

why would he

he didnt consider them human

That's my point.

Wait uncoincidentally.

I am very tired.

It wasn't Hitler's idea to gas Jews.

It wasn't even his idea to kill them.

fuck you beat me

It was Reinhard Heydrich to decided to gas Jews.

But Hitler is a useful bogeyman.

"pass ze glass of juice"

I am a true nationalist and a true socialist. Nazis were only one of those things.

WTF I love Hitler now

I don't care if you think that.

The socialism was only added to the name to appeal to the German left.

This is basic history. Come on now.

Well National Socialist is the name of the party in Germany so there wouldn't be one.

National Socialist is the name of the party in Germany so there wouldn't be one.

I think you are incorrectly conflating National Socialism with nationalist socialism, which is third positionism.

The Nazis tarnished the reputation of Il Duce

red pill me

someone

Mussolini was already tarnishing his reputation before WWII by destroying the Italian economy.

https://youtu.be/biv8DB1CM14

No he saved the Italian economy.

No, he didn't.

No

Mussolini was an honorable leader

Italy was able to avoid the economic disaster of the Great Depression (relatively) because Italy was an agrarian country full of dirt farmers. If you compare Italy to Romania you won't find much difference.

Italy's economy was in shambles before Mussolini.

Mussolini isn't responsible for that I'm sorry to say.

And not really...

Yes lol really

Italy was urban in the north.

The entire focus of Mussolini was to industrialize the country because it consistently fell behind the industrialized powers of Europe since it became a single state.

And it still fell behind in the 1930's.

Yet he was successful at that, but (((Hitler))) simply ruined everything.

No, it fell behind before WWII as I already said.