that doesn't fit 'racialist' experts ideology

Sub-species can be very similiar.

And even procreate together.

well neanderthal is a sub species

homo sapiens too

and that's it

Human populations are actually relatively low in diversity, compared to other animal species.

a pug and a germ shep are very similar

So sub-species of sub-species.

I never said humans were simply.

wait what

simple*

No true.

i thought you said species for a second

but sub species

isn't even an agreed on

scientific taxnomical thing

No, because that's "waycis"

Kek

Clines and demes and ring species are diffcult to measure

those are what are often considered 'sub-species'

To call whites and blacks different species entirely is a huge stretch.

if an african man and an white woman have a baby, it's perfectly biologically fine and fertile, while if you fuck a bonobo, it wil not go well

yeah the (((scientists))) dont agree on that because they are bourgeoisie and want to earn capital from lying to goyim

LOL

THE ACADEMICS

CONTROLLED BY JEWS

DA JOOZ

now under communism we'd have race realism for sure

lol everything is the jews

CONTROLLING THE WORLD

DA JOOOOOOOZ

DA JOOZ

behind everything again

and then you say we blame everything on capitalism

REEEEEEEEEEEE

you blame anything on the juwwss

literally sperging out rn lmao

**academics disagree on race**
**fucking jews amirite**

The academics have their own motives and biases towards their research. When you have a community that generally agrees on one thing, going against them is an ultimate death sentence for your career.

>any fact
>THE JEWWWRS

You call the Fascist party a larping shitshow, and yet, here you communists are, acting like children in a debate.

academics don't disagree on race because of the jews

>Oh shit I have no evidence for my claims

>Itz

>itz

>da JOOZ

they disagree on it because there's not conclusive evidence for it

```The academics have their own motives and biases towards their research. When you have a community that generally agrees on one thing, going against them is an ultimate death sentence for your career.```

Or because of their personal bias and expectation.

here's some actual data

so earth is flat then

You cannot say that Science is 100% accurate without some bias added.

I have a larger than average amount of Neanderthal in me

Somehow

and i can fuck a bonobo freely because it will make a fine baby

@Deleted User It was until someone actually went against the grain and said it wasn't.

this is about genetic clustering

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Rosenberg_1048people_993markers.jpg/800px-Rosenberg_1048people_993markers.jpg

and the sun is like 2 miles long

and square shaped

now fucking tell me

how many

because science isn't real folks

K buckets

do we ned?

it's a jewish lie

wake up sheeple

Do you have sources for that?

you can choose any number of K buckets

Like an actual link?

2+2 actually equals 6 because JEWSSS

I can observe on some trusted site?

@Deleted User Stop sperging you child.

Hehe

@Rygus can't take a joke cracka?

You're annoying, and this is a debate room.

Take your jokes elsewhere.

i've been debating seriously for hours and it's so useless with you

https://web.stanford.edu/group/rosenberglab/papers/popstruct.pdf

>rosenberg

DA JOOZ

hmm

rosenberg

hmm

hmmmm

^

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Lmao

because anything we say, it's either the jews or "not true lol where is the hentai server"

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Literally just did it

how many buckets do we need to cluster humans into objectively?

I literally just joined, and all you've done is accuse me of things I haven't done, and then proceeded to do that shit yourself.

what objective number

do we choose?

i'm not accusing you but your fash buddies

like cockring fan

don't take everything personally man