debate

Discord ID: 463068752725016579


34,246 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 4/343 | Next

2018-07-02 04:25:22 UTC

But SCOTUS doesn't have the absolute power to order POTUS to do anything

2018-07-02 04:25:22 UTC

@Rils you don't have to answer if you don't want to, but how old are you?

2018-07-02 04:25:30 UTC

I'll be 30 in a month

2018-07-02 04:26:14 UTC

Do you think the better system would be to put the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a new constitutional amendment?

2018-07-02 04:26:16 UTC

Also, Discord etiquette, you don't need to keep pinging me unless it looks like I've wandered away.

2018-07-02 04:27:00 UTC

Oh sorry, today is literally the most time I've ever spent on Discord. I walked away from online chatting in 2003

2018-07-02 04:28:33 UTC

I think for the most part, the Civil Rights Act was a step in the right direction

2018-07-02 04:29:56 UTC

It was the means by which they enforced it that may have been a necessary evil, I'm not fully sure how I feel about that part.

2018-07-02 04:30:46 UTC

Agreed

2018-07-02 04:31:41 UTC

At this point, I feel like we could have an amendment like it to the constitution pass, and that would be for the best

2018-07-02 04:32:13 UTC

I don't think it's necessary anymore

2018-07-02 04:34:59 UTC

I don't think they can enforce morality forever.

2018-07-02 04:35:05 UTC

I would like to see it done, just so we don't have to rely on the commerce clause anymore. And add "sexual orientation" while we are at it

2018-07-02 04:35:48 UTC

Interesting, I hadn't considered morals

2018-07-02 04:36:26 UTC

morality debate still

2018-07-02 04:36:27 UTC

jeez

2018-07-02 04:36:37 UTC

lets debate god or something fun

2018-07-02 04:36:46 UTC

i need inspiration lmao

2018-07-02 04:36:58 UTC

It's government enforcement of morals via the Civil Rights Act of 1964

2018-07-02 04:36:59 UTC

I like to think of the laws as there to guarantee our freedoms, and a law that prohibits someone from discriminating against me for something I cannot control as a way to guarantee more freedoms for more people

2018-07-02 04:37:29 UTC

My concern is, what about that someone's freedom to associate?

2018-07-02 04:37:38 UTC

@kilo (twitter-imkilo) what about eye for an eye

2018-07-02 04:37:46 UTC

You're taking away that person's freedoms to make you more comfortable.

2018-07-02 04:37:49 UTC

so someone kills one of your people

2018-07-02 04:37:53 UTC

so you kill one of their people

2018-07-02 04:38:00 UTC

laws can beimmoral

2018-07-02 04:38:15 UTC

An eye for an eye is not United States law, and I'm ill equipped to debate anything else

2018-07-02 04:38:35 UTC

@kilo (twitter-imkilo) ok but the us law is based upon that

2018-07-02 04:38:39 UTC

Of course, you can't control how you look, but that person's thoughts and heart can be changed, but not at the end of the barrel of a gun.

2018-07-02 04:39:08 UTC

it goes back to ancient times the eye for an eye shit

2018-07-02 04:39:21 UTC

While I think it's admirable to force people to not discriminate, I don't think it's ultimately a social good to force people to cooperate.

2018-07-02 04:39:47 UTC

you are better off with out laws we have now , but a new system of rule inside the digital age

2018-07-02 04:40:00 UTC

It might be based on that, but like Rils and I were saying earlier, it's better to go by whats in the law now, instead of trying to manipulate the law into what you think it should be

2018-07-02 04:40:00 UTC

for example decentralized control, concensus, arbitors

2018-07-02 04:40:31 UTC

And also I don't think an eye for eye is the correct way to go through life. Context matters after all

2018-07-02 04:41:01 UTC

@kilo (twitter-imkilo) and the way the laws are made mostly is by corrupting vote rigging

2018-07-02 04:41:07 UTC

so if that action is immoral

2018-07-02 04:41:12 UTC

are the laws moral

2018-07-02 04:41:20 UTC

we can do down lots of these slippery slopes

2018-07-02 04:41:49 UTC

for example the law for marijauna prohibition

2018-07-02 04:42:04 UTC

causes harm and damage to people and eocnomy as result to people

2018-07-02 04:42:07 UTC

Discord Etiquette (again): It's unnecessary and sometimes seen as aggressive and rude to ping people when they're most likely still paying attention, you should save it for when you believe they've drifted away.

2018-07-02 04:42:09 UTC

Hey gang, I'm being pulled away by real life.

2018-07-02 04:42:23 UTC

Yes, legalize marijuanna, 100%

2018-07-02 04:42:38 UTC

Mariijuanna*

2018-07-02 04:42:42 UTC

@Rils ok but if im addressing you and not someone else?

2018-07-02 04:42:44 UTC

however it's spelleed

2018-07-02 04:42:52 UTC

I'm still reading, you can just type my name

2018-07-02 04:42:54 UTC

and pereception. i dont look at it as agressive

2018-07-02 04:43:06 UTC

ok its easier to type @ then up

2018-07-02 04:43:07 UTC

lol

2018-07-02 04:43:14 UTC

im lazy dont think its agressive

2018-07-02 04:43:21 UTC

get us a hug bot or something

2018-07-02 04:43:23 UTC

The whole yellow highlighting thing bugs me

2018-07-02 04:43:31 UTC

damn dawg really

2018-07-02 04:43:34 UTC

lmfao

2018-07-02 04:44:00 UTC

seems a bit picky there rils

2018-07-02 04:44:05 UTC

Dont tag fucking rils

2018-07-02 04:44:35 UTC

I don't see it as aggressive (usually), I'm just passing along my experience with Discord.

2018-07-02 04:44:48 UTC

I'm just more annoyed by it personally

2018-07-02 04:45:02 UTC

But if it looks like I'm not here, ping away

2018-07-02 04:45:06 UTC

it's annoying whne you have discord on your phone too

2018-07-02 04:45:18 UTC

well discord should disable tags then

2018-07-02 04:45:20 UTC

what the fuck is the use

2018-07-02 04:45:23 UTC

if it annoys people

2018-07-02 04:45:32 UTC

The point is to attract someone to the channel when they might be away

2018-07-02 04:45:39 UTC

just kill that shit

2018-07-02 04:45:42 UTC

fuck attention

2018-07-02 04:45:45 UTC

thats for bitches

2018-07-02 04:45:50 UTC

i was just using as a wy to address

2018-07-02 04:45:52 UTC

Like how Imkilo tagged me and the other guy after a couple hours of silence

2018-07-02 04:45:55 UTC

who i was speakking towards

2018-07-02 04:46:09 UTC

but ya i think discord would have better retention without tags

2018-07-02 04:46:16 UTC

and get better sounds

2018-07-02 04:46:19 UTC

for notications

2018-07-02 04:46:31 UTC

They do need to add changing the sounds

2018-07-02 04:46:34 UTC

two things. make this shit go viral like FB to billion or two

2018-07-02 04:46:37 UTC

get rid of gamer bullshit

2018-07-02 04:46:38 UTC

Although I don't use the sounds

2018-07-02 04:46:39 UTC

im not a gamer

2018-07-02 04:46:46 UTC

"chat for gamers"

2018-07-02 04:46:48 UTC

im not a fuckin gamer

2018-07-02 04:46:49 UTC

lmfao

2018-07-02 04:46:55 UTC

stop branding to kids

2018-07-02 04:47:03 UTC

"chat for human"

2018-07-02 04:47:06 UTC

simple fix

2018-07-02 04:47:06 UTC

<:thonk:364328736499433482>

2018-07-02 04:47:20 UTC

well its not for gamers anymore

2018-07-02 04:47:36 UTC

just for

2018-07-02 04:47:38 UTC

It's still primarily used by gamers

2018-07-02 04:47:38 UTC

i mean

2018-07-02 04:47:50 UTC

That's still their primary focus

2018-07-02 04:47:51 UTC

we've kind of co-opted it to be fair

2018-07-02 04:47:52 UTC

dude their is a pNd group with 100k ppl today.. scamming shit

2018-07-02 04:47:57 UTC

mostly gamers use it for sure

2018-07-02 04:48:08 UTC

The server I admin is for some LPers

2018-07-02 04:48:13 UTC

also, this is basically just a modern IRC

2018-07-02 04:48:16 UTC

So Gaming is still a big deal

2018-07-02 04:48:19 UTC

irc is better

2018-07-02 04:48:24 UTC

discord rapes u for data

34,246 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 4/343 | Next