debate
Discord ID: 463068752725016579
34,246 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 29/343
| Next
@missdanger BINGO okay okayl... lets see here ...
okay everyone .... listen up....
"i dont consent"
now what
Well, you can feel free to move!
What you not consenting to?
Laws.
Apparently...
naw, still wrong. you hate what you dont understand
laws arent the same as colors of law
have you ever even heard of color of law?
evidently not
Oh, I have. ๐
Wait a minute, it seems like the topic is getting off tracked
you are not bound to color of law jurisdictions arbitrarily and absolutely
Well under our somewhat weird ass legal system, you are still under the jurisdiction of US domestic laws even if you dont consent. My house my rule kinda stuff
municipal codes and statutes are not the same as laws
'Traffic signs aren't laws!'
Oh god! You're a SovCit!
yeah AS IF theres no incentive to obey traffic signs
AS IF i would just run stop lights wrecklessly if not for laws ... come on man give me a break
I hope we get a new member who is a paralegalis to clear things up
Question, question! Do you 'travel' in your car?
i obey them cuz i dont wanna get in a fucking car wreck
lol you are a very triggered individual
do i travel in my car?
um , doestn everyone commuting do so?
๐คฃ
do you not travel in your car?
I drive my car.
what do you do? teleport?
I ride a moose, like all canadians
oh, and youre not traveling while youre driving? I AM SO CONFUSED
Maybe you're not full on SovCit, but you're one bad traffic citation away from it.
Society is monitored under incentives, both self-interests and coercive. We obey guidelines because of consequences that will directly or indirectly impaired our quality of life.
naw, im probably a better driver than you are. i have had MANY jobs as a driver. im a fuggin pro at driving
Why is am I being detain there twice?
you sure like to paint ppl up into the "other" too .... weak strawman arguments
That chart is cheating
That chart is Bingo.
Did you win?
"i do not consent" ??? LOL WTF man you are discrediting yourself!
I came a lot closer than than you'd expect.
AS IF police do not already ASK for your permission to search your car if they dont have probable cause
๐คฃ
Oh, sure, they do.
There's a difference between asking permission and an order
you are not required to obey arbitrary orders if youre not beign detained. if youre not being detained, you are by nature free to go
this is some real common sense shit dude
AM I BEING DETAINED
lol
I can't tell if either of you are trolling or not
keep regressign to trollign cuz weak/no arguments
(btw I did NOT make this game)
Even if you are detained you are not required to obey arbitrary orders
hes just trolling now
What happened to the police debate
this is what it has regressed into
callign me a sovereign citizen and shit like that
What was the last point being made?
Oh I don't remember. This just became funny as hell to me.
well you crack yourself up, mate
If anyone CAN get us back on track...
As a third party, this debate is difficult to keep track of.
Same
It keeps diverging
it stopped being a debate a while ago
regressing into trolling
Police don't have extra rights.
They have duties.
Duties put upon them by the municipalities they serve.
If you're advocating for private security firms
Poptarts - Today at 2:36 PM
i already went over this ... police in CA for example are allowed to open carry... us plebians are not
I'd covered that point already.
I'll restate
The Police are armed in service to their jurisdictions. Enforcement of Open Carry laws are the laws that were agreed upon.
Arguing that you are above the jurisdiction in which you live is essentially arguing your own independence from the system.
agreed upon by whom? not everyone agreed to this ideas that is supposed to rely on supposed agreement
Put 200 people in a room
Have them order one type of pizza.
you live in Texas, dont you?
to feed everyone in the room.
you should know that an armed society is a polite society
Oh, absolutely!
California's a fucking joke!
Does that mean I would go and buy an illegal weapon?
Absolutely not.
Regardless on whether everyone agrees or not, don't the voters decide that?
Poptarts is arguing the rights of the dissenting party.
look, i back the police more than you think even if you WANT to paint me in the light that you do bcuz of whatever triggering issues you have with other anti-police extremists, which i also disagree with as well
Feel free to tell me if that was a mischaracterization
I think that last statement was rather fair.
I mean, you didn't hesitate to call them a terrorist organization...
Nor did you walk it back, when I gave you the opportunity to.
it was an edgy comment, you got triggered... maybe they should just fire all low IQ thuggards so we wont have to worry about the terrorism anymore
Wewlad
Can I see your data?
But the problem with that is, that's pretty much a lot of them
On the IQ of the 'thuggards' in the police force?
Then again higher IQ doesn't make better police
they even have workplace alternative IQ tests to make sure most police arent "too smart"
Higher IQ doesn't make a better human.
Lower IQ might, as they tend to follow orders
34,246 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 29/343
| Next