Did anyone else notice he said "the far left isn't representative or that influential" and then IMMEDIATELY parroted a shitload of far left talking points

The journalist guy I mean

who did? Tim or that bald guy?

get it? 😛

Bald guy yeah

Well i noticed that guy was pretty indoctrinated

Tim just hasn't realized the Democrat party isn't liberal at all at this point

he excused a LOT of shit from the left, and hammered typical anti-right sentiment

and a lot of "Yeah well i can't speak for THOSE guys"

That's what I mean. Those exact same arguments I could have (and have) heard from any far lefty progressive

Well i get where he's coming from

but he should be more objective on either side

At one point he even said something like "the entire Republican party is extremist and racist" before talking about how Republicans are literally trying to kill people

yeah

Cuz David Duke liked where Trumps america was going

Tell me you don't hear that shit from any other far left idiot

well, I like where Trumps America is going too, i still spit on Duke and the KKK

This is the same thing as if you took the views of the dumbest people in the GOP and made that your worldview

Except, at least insofar as I have seen myself, I haven't seen a Republican actually do this.

Then again, O'Reilly did say that stupid tides thing

that's something I don't get

ppl saying that "both sides do it"

they are

but it's like, the far left points are WIDELY heard

in media everywhere

Both sides do a lot of things. It's just to different degrees of severity

well thats Media

and then they pick "right wing points" from people that we never hear

and that noone supports

I'm sure there's at least ONE right wing journalist that they're citing

nah, Media picks right-wing points from exactly the peopel they kept alive

they keep people like Richard Spencer around

as controlled opposition

"Haha look at this racist idiot"

But yeah id bet that journalist or person isn't actually taken serioisly

and spencer will smile and nod cuz he's actually buying into his own crap

I actually don't know anything about Richard Spencer

I know what they say about him. But never heard anythiing from him tbh

I firmly believe that Democrats have conducted and almost non stop smear campaign of propaganda through MSM generally for the better part of 40 years

he's a literal nazi,

wants to have 1935 German culture,
Wants socialism, ethnostate etc

his words, not mine

At least in germany the left and right engage in violence, but the lrft tends to focus on prpperty damage and the right more on killing people

@Dr.Wol I'd argue he isn't really

then why is he "on the right"?

Cuz the media puts him there

i'd argue any "Nazi" falls under socialist left

He's a clear evolution of Nazism

Be it better or worse

he's not an evolution

he's a retard

But he's relatively harmless

kept alive in the media cuz he's a perfect target

Not every evolution is a good one Wol

Some are retarded

thats a devolution 😉 he devolved

I did my moral test

ohnoz

post it here

he's a moralist

No. He added new traits to the genetics of Nazism

I will post in shitposting

It's just they're traits like "ability to eat rocks but they make you retarded"

Useless

And really dumb

in general its the same schpill

Did you write an essay @Kris

No why?

Nvm

but people like spencer are intentionally around,

So that they don't have to represent the real Right-wing side

and can lie about it

Yeah I agree

It's part of the smear strategy

I'm only worried with companies not carrying about money latelly

they do

they just think that the road to money is in the loudest 8% of the people

I see it like the Muslim extremist stuff

can we discuss this here btw? Coz I have a lot of doubts and don't know where I stand on it actually

its politics free for all, go nuts

companies going to morals and banning people

Yes 8% are the actual islamists/progactivists but there's another 25-50% that support those fuckers at least somewhat

instead of caring about money

they don't

I'm on the right. So I'm against regulation

its a marketing strategy, caused by fear of shame

@.B stick to that position.

I think companies that do that will eventually die out in a free market, But in silicon valley they have created a sort of trust.

The companies that go down this road are going to get hurt

but I don't really have much of an answer to a bunch of companies in the market speaking among themselves and banning everyone they disagree with

I mean its basically
"We're the company that loves everyone who is nice and god, and everyone should come here"

vs

"We're the company thats okay with nazis, everyone is free here"

its Social media damage control

I think so to, that the free market will take care of it

they don't want hate-mobs

but in the short time, I'm not too sure

they'll lose money in the long run and revert

or they'll die off 😄

what do you guys think of the banning of Gab?

There is almost no freemarket though. Since half a dozen companies control everything.

i saw that coming from a mile away

Banning it is wrong.

they even stole their domain