its obsolete

The whole Goal of the UN was to combat USSR

You're confusing the UN with NATO

the UN was developed to replace the league of nations and put more weight behind it

The UN was to replace the League of Nations which somehow sucked even more

No the UN is far better than the League of Nations

well i got 2 answers at that , my bad you might be right my memory not so good

That’s what I was saying

The League somehow sucked even more than the UN

ah gotcha

Yea that was due to a lack of incentives and authority on the part of the league

~~Anyway yeah we’ve gotta kick China and the Nazis off the moon~~

what i dont understand is why do the countries who commit seriouse violations EVEN join the human rights commision ?

~~And I know it can be done because it’s been done before~~

It was little more than a group of powerful nations that said "we promise not to do bad things"

is it all to pretend and just use it to point fingers thats all the middle east does they all just hate Isreal

Think they got one too ?

what happened here ?

Because they have a vested intrest in either correcting their nations problems or deflecting from them

What better way to deflect than to have a inside view on the organization that will try to hold you accountable

after watching back to back 3 years of footage it mostly seems deflecting nothing changed no new laws to prevent the same behaviour in most of those countries

There is nothing that the UN can do

Its most powerful tools are locked behind the approval of the security council permanent members

Peacekeeping forces and Sanctions being the two strongest

Outside of that the Un is more or less identical to the league of nations in terms of its power

It mainly serves as a intermediary and a unbiased third party in fact finding missions/negotiations

Venezuala While its people are Starving and they inprison political opponents had the audacity to point fingers at members who had the least amount of issues assoon as the NGO says the truth about venezuala they pretend to be insulted and ask that the NGO be silenced . no wonder the UN isnt working because the main Body Caters to the Ones who oppress the most .

@Blackhawk342 I totally agree. As a Military veteran who operated under NATO, I know a lot of my old comrades who also operated under the UN. Story was always the same from the ground troops. They could do nothing because their hands were always tied. Case in point, Bosnia

Damnit lol

Peek them off the moon Spectre at all costs lol

*keep* them off, I shall

The Red tape is seirously problematic

It took the UN 2 years to fix what our Commandos did in 6 months

Hang on murbay

I have a good picture for you

Replace UN with League of Democracies. States that fail to meet certain standards of democratic governance are ejected.

now i'm no filthy disgusting communist but why the fuck money cost so much

This is the UN in a nutshell, especially with regards to peacekeeping missions

Hah that rifle is the worst

Haha SA80, cocking handle would fall off at the worst times 😂

no idea why the UN has more than 5 security council members, the perma 5 just dictate everything anyway

the UN is notorious for doing two things in peacekeeping operations: using mostly 3rd world armies and terrible Rules of Engagement

not to mention you would know the magazine Release is on the side where you push it against your chest too hard when running the mag goes bye bye

Uninvolved in Africa

You know, a lot of people call me a contrarian, but I'm just not.

I just saw Tim's latest vid. That typo tho.

Hey . . i may be on the south part of africa but we got our own issues thank you lol.

Everyone knows immediately that the UN from command and conquer is fictional

In several instances of Africa areas with UN operations saw an increase in rapes and STDs

Because they actually do something

Yup

we do have a Aids problem ill give you that

The first would countries contribute a majority of the funding to the UN, but very little manpower outside of observation missions

Second and third world countries contribute a majority of the manpower but very little to no funding

In the defence of ground troops, they witnessed some of the worst situations simply because they had to watch people being abused but were powerless to do anything. Their opponents knew that too which is why they did things in front of them

Mostly manpower . some of our African union nations Want to stop helping with manpower and help more in joint operations

List of countries and the amount of men they provide
Ethiopia (8,326)
India (7,471)
Pakistan (7,161)
Bangladesh (6,772)
Rwanda (6,146)
Nepal (5,131)
Senegal (3,617)
Burkina Faso (3,036)
Ghana (2,972)
Egypt (2,889)
Indonesia (2,867)
China (2,639)
Tanzania (2,341)
Nigeria (2,170)
Niger (1,871)
Togo (1,661)
Morocco (1,607)
Chad (1,489)
Uruguay (1,457)
South Africa (1,427)
Brazil (1,303)
Kenya (1,229)
Benin (1,174)
Cameroon (1,137)
Italy (1,114)

now those are just the top 25

Well Howdy doody i never imagine our lazy asses managed to give the UN 1.427

I bet its mostly Former Commando Vets

But yes murbay, ROE doesnt allow them to do anything unless they are fired upon

even then its only defensive actions as far as im aware

back in 2013 we sent soldiers into the Congo . to "help" the goverment over there. turns out it was abit of a . . . poltical nonsense thing wich led to us getting Casualties .

bingo bango bongo i dont want to leave the congo

Lol

Was same under NATO on the ground too @Blackhawk342. However, we did have the advantage of using initiative if the situation called for it. But still tied to same ROE, we just didn't need approval before reacting

Bingo bango bongo im so happy in the jungle where i used to go

Right, because NATO is a military organization and the UN is a political organization

Exactly 🙂

We didnt want the UN involved .because it turned out our president at the time was trying to Rescue his Investment at the expence of our soldiers lives

lol

that explains what happened to your president

Zuma ? oh hes still in court

on the tax payers dime

wich makes us furious

we tried to impeach him 4 times

wait wtf

what do you mean hes still on trial

no hes not on trial thats the beuty of it he is being implicated in all his illegal Dealings he had 175 charges of corruption against him BEFORE he was elected

and he was elected twice

So what, he can’t be tried while in office?

No he was used loopholes to Stall court cases

for 6 years

on tax payers money

Making Africa great.

and people ask why africa wont progress

Aren't they killing all the white people in some country in africa?

Killing?

ya, ...

oh boy

well that means where in what province in my country

I thought it was appropriating their land.

here we go

Limpopo has the most farm attacks

KZN is getting worse now