It will basically become rule by corporations

but it’s closer

Because private property requires law

all anarchy is garbage

How the hell does that happen, dickwad?

Everything is violence, water. Tell me what is special about physical pain

@Water who will have the most control

Nobody has any control over another individual.

then how the fuck will corps function

Voluntary association.

I will have control over my family

Ownership is a legal term, no law no ownership

I will exert control over anyone trying to challenge me

it's really quite simple

you don’t get to shoot your wife if she does something you’re not happy with, Bear.

Yea, what backing do you have over your private property

I will exert control over anyone that is a threat to my objectives

a gun?

I can make her die of hunger, Water

Bearer owns the property

his wife is on his property

no laws to protect is wife

stepping on someone else’s property isn’t violence, moron.

You are relying solely on morality to protect people

Invading is a threat that is solved with violence

This is part of the nap

If someone comes on your property with the intent to seriously harm you, and continues to act toward that, you can shoot em’

but them being there isn’t inherently aggressive.

what if they are on your property

yet refuse to leave

but doesnt want to hurt you

physical removal, the only way they can stay is if they try to harm you.

Thats still a violation of the NAP

If someone is occupying part of your property, they are taking away your right of ownership

how will you physically remove them

im getting flashbacks from the naked ape server

depends on your level of escalation.

i’d tell them to get off your property, and if that doesn’t work do it again with a weapon.

if they continue to refuse shove em’ off.

shoving?

that can be considered violence

generally an attempt to significantly harm another unprovoked would be considered aggression.

it went from violence to aggression

They deal with the same ideas.

Water, how long are you into politics?

^

i’ve been libertarian/ancap for 2-3 years, but i’ve been around politics for my whole life.

Everyone starts as either a reactionary communist or a reactionary libertarian

Ive been authright since paris attacks

the closest to capitalism ive been was during my monarchy days

but that was when I was still sorta new

to economics

what’s wrong with capitalism?

It degenerates culture

It puts profit over culture

The search for profit is detrimental to the long term availability of everything

what do you think capitalism is?

Capitalism is a term coined by Marx, it already starts bad

eh, the origin of terminology doesn’t make it illegitimate.

It is a societal structure of the ownership of the means of production

Im surprised pinochet wanst brought up yet

i would say that true capitalism is unregulated trade.

Marx isn't bad as an economist tbh

@Water so cpaitalism never existed

Etymologically speaking, it's the societal search for profit rather than social goals

im sure it existed at some point, but not in the way you’re thinking.

So you're saying that money destroyed capitalism

something can be partially capitalist, but absolute capitalism has never really been implemented.

federal notes are retarded, yes.

that’s the edgy name for money.

epic, anprim is the only true ancap

He basically founded the modern study of economics.
Also, your definition is objectivly wrong @Water and you can know that just by reading the wiki article on capitalism tbh femme

li b tard

Not an argument

so water wants...anprim

Wikipedia does not determine all things.

Anprim is against the invention of technology

Everything is technology

would you be ok with transhumanism

No, but this isn't really something up for debate you know.

And Marx coined the term, you can't reframe it to what you like

anprims are a damn joke

water would you be ok with transhumanism

If you’d prefer the term “free markets” to capitalism, that’s fine.

An anything is a joke

All "an-" are a joke

that’s a good point

the only thing anarchy could be good for is a reset

Yes, like political philosophy 101 deals with these abominations and why they are wrong

not a goal

If transhumanism doesn’t involve the imitation of force, go ahead.

Fake christian

>Christian

anarchism is more of a symptom than an ideal of ancaps.

>Ok with Transhumanism

Technology can certainly allow something we would consider an evolution of current humans.

anarchism is the absolute right of free association, not a symptom, you still know nothing about terms and keep trying to reframe them

water, youre sounding like a liberal focusing on violence

if it hurt dopamine it bad

i have exactly one idea, don’t initiate violence against others.