habbening-bunker
Discord ID: 491413693339271178
4,052 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 6/41
| Next
This makes place for someone good to stand as Chancelor, but at the same time makes room for someone even worse
According to reports she's stepping down because "recently she met with her advisors and the admins from her party and their Democratic party and they looked and only saw widespread dissatisfaction throughout the country."
>2021
not soon enough
Agreed
Just enough time for her to make Europe brown
The U.S. will send 5,000 troops to the U.S.-Mexico to counter a massive migrant caravan, the Wall Street Journal reported Monday.
The new estimate is a dramatic increase from Thursday, when the military planned to only deploy 800 troops.
According to The Journal, troops will be stationed at ports of entry divided among Texas, Arizona and California and will later help with administrative tasks on the U.S.-side of the border.
>only 800 troops
>now increased to 5,000 combat trained soldiers
>against 6-7,000 civilians
DIS GON B GUD
Itโs now 5,200 now, I think.
It keeps going up.
Who thinks theyre gonna use these along with the noisybois
>550 yards
Shut up you disgusting amalgamation of genes
550 yards for non lethal though
It's enough to basically tell them to fuck off.
Im pretty sure someone is gonna start shooting though
Democrats are being called liars and fakers for everything the past two months, they need something to use against their opponents
I just hope that they keep them off our soil otherwise the court system is going to be overloaded more than usual
Aye.
550yd is plenty of stand-off distance
The optics of this situation are gonna be super bad tho.
God I wish I was deployed already
Coz these are active duty troops
Not reserves
Aw man, why don't they let the reserves do it
It's not like they're doing anything else
550yds is more than enough, although no matter what the optics are horrible as you have people either illegally entering the country while the country looks weak or forcefully keeping them out and looking authoritarian
There's no good way to look, might as well do the right thing and turn them around, tell them to go through proper channels
That would be the best option, although try to tell that to the caravan. All I know is that we can't let them just waltz or force their way in, we don't negotiate with terrorists
Right
I personally think that the current legal immigration system needs heavy reform, but we can't just let a bunch of people in in spite of the laws.
I think the current state in Europe is showing that mass amounts of illegals flooding Europe is causing havoc and the coastal countries are either letting it happen or are powerless to stop it
@Nic386 Well because the Reserves are for filling in the holes in divisions from real wars! *starts 3rd international proxy war in 10 years*
I'm not a proponent of mass immigration by any means, I just think we should have a better process than I've been lead to believe we currently have for those who would follow our laws to enter our country.
Maybe our immigration system is actually where I think it should be, but all the shit I hear about it right now is partisan so I can't really trust any of it
Civic nationalism is globalism
well thats like, your opinion man
Replacing a people is replacing a nation
Who said I want to "Replace" People
what are you on about
The jews
ok
>At the 82nd shipyard in Roslyakov, the floating dock PD-50 sank, users of social networks report citing factory workers. There are people injured.
>It is reported that on the night of October 30, during the departure of the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov from the dock, an emergency occurred. As a result, the dock itself sank, and a tower crane fell on the aircraft carrier. Information also appeared on the four victims. According to unconfirmed reports, workers could get into the water.
>According to the relatives of one of the workers, a rescue operation is underway. Alarm services have been pulled to the scene.
>Soyuz fails
>Kuznetsov damaged
>Su-57 crashes
It's 1991 all over again.
Can we just talk about how the Su-57 is over 1 TWR at mission load? And also the sexy lovechild of an F-22 and YF-23.
Like that airframe is just... mmmm...
Dunno how I feel about the leading edge transition between the engine cowling and the wing though
There are sightings of trucks helping the migrant caravan that have the star of david.
We all know what's going to happen.
Be ready for the Trump is an antisemite.
And knowing the migrant caravan, they have no intention of stopping at the border.
This shit is perfectly timed with elections, it's not a coincidence.
Someone has to clothe and feed these fuckers plus, in all their pictures they're bathed, rested, and non-malnourished.
Most marches the people look likes shit and are caked in dirt.
Well obviously
None of this shit is coincidental
(((coincidental)))
((((they)))) are on the move. i hope Trump stomps this down immediately.
Nothing good will come of this
Trump stomping down on this would actually make it worse
>taking a stand makes it worse
>just do nothing and accept that you're fucked
Okay retard
Who said do nothing?
Youโre kind of obligated to do something. But the optics are critical
There is a lot of political energy around this, and youโd be a fool to not acknowledge it.
Yeah, and the fact of the matter is that the only way to deal with and prevent further incidents of this type is a no compromise reaction
Either entry denial, or detainment en masse is the only suitable action IMO
I have to agree with that
I mean we tried compromise before
With the Reagan amnesty deal back in the 80s
I dont think anything more than that is acceptable unless the caravan gets violent
Ofc
Wasnt that more for peope who were imported en mass in the 30s-50s?
or am I missremembering
Im fairly sure missremembering because there were attempts to pass stronger border security legislation at the time
ok
The whole idea was amnesty first border deal second but the latter never came because of Democrat unwillingness to pass anything once they got what they wanted
At least if I remember correctly
Why don't we import them to states that need migrants
Like Ontario
Bad idea
Nah fam let Canada have them
Societal problems caused by the migration far outweigh the short term economic benefits
So what if 10k *go missing*
Let Cali have them then remove it from the Union
And with the loose border between the US and Canada we risk entry of them coming here as well
Should Canada decide to take them
I'm not saying an a10 could fix the problem but I would call a broken arrow on myself in the middle of that caravan
doesnt broken arrow refer to an Accident involving a nuclear weapon?
Yes
It's for the greater good
I've licked a few of the weapon casings from those accidents
Give me a Davey crocket and a dream
Amnesty under Reagan and the Cuban bullshit don't forget that
Where if they made it to our shores they can stay
4,052 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 6/41
| Next