Message from @Blebleh
Discord ID: 314519571568787466
Subjectivity is important. There is no subjectively imperialist = there is no imperialism.
China and Russia today can defend Syria
but it's still an imperialist bloc, just one with interests against the national bourgeoisie of the US and Europe
yes, so I say, every try to help other nations is for the national bourgeoisie not for socialism
it obeys the logic of capital not proletarian internationalism
@Blebleh There was no national bourgeoisie in power in USSR under Brezhnev.
Only revisionist scum
If you would trade openly for profit you would go to prison.
Even if you sell a cigarette
What kind of class of bourgeoisie in power is that?
It's almost like it's just a bunch of economic D&C
That can't possibly be, can it? I are all the facets of socialism just veils over a death cult?
Stalin denounced the cult of personality
And yet...
if something it was permitted
we have to know the melting point of the policies and they have heads
Aaah. So it is. And human suffering is the fuel for this crucible, yes?
in the USSR the life expectancy skyrocketed and the GDP growed, as well as the limitation of the labours of work
but I disagree with a tenet of leninism
That's the rumblings of an underground capitalist oligarchy booting up.
Human suffering as fuel for the crucible of socialism is a long used metaphor.
I think banning factions breeds revisionism because it removes the accountability and the culture of revision with the ones who are in charge
It comes from outside the dialectic, however, call it an "outside" joke.
Limiting the scope of your discussion to a few fantasy books also removes a lot of accountability
Trotskyists say that it was temporal
Lmfao
and pro-Stalin advocates say it wasn't
Who lived longer?
That was the correct socialist
I doubt that even in a temporal ban you could restore it again as you wanted
but what they discuss more is the thing of permanent revolution
and pro-Stalin people think that in this case, it isn't leninist and that it would kill the revolution
and then we have council communists
and bordigists
All that shut you just said is basically the cancer that ends each revolution before it may reach its second stable point. P
Or the other complimentary cancer; the fallacious notion that writhing every socialist revolution lies the pupae of a functional state.
*bordiga gets offended* 😛