Message from @Carlisle
Discord ID: 797008204700712980
This is old shit thats been debunked months ago
The defense was "voter dumps" right?
He says in the article he didn't go through the data himself
So what's the point of that
oh it "could be misleading"
Change the c in your name to s
Because the guy who suggested it can be used in fraud
said it doesn't seem out of the ordinary
<:cryingbugman:738000461386350653>
therefore it didn't happen
Pedophile
I love journalists based in Madrid with a masters in Science Communication how credible
If u knew how to read im sure you'd be able to identify why it doesnt apply for reasons other than "it said so"
yeah?
That is literally the defense lmao
Okay
"In this paper I study a statistical method intended to help detect election fraud. Other methods, using regression-based techniques for outlier detection,have previously been proposed to help detect election anomalie"
When his method is applied in this scenario
It comes back with the same rate of detection
If you think about it the brain named itself 🤯
If you think about it no one cares