Message from @Vitmar
Discord ID: 624704208188211230
I answered 2, but the others I had to point proper specialists works
- They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
- They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to the question.
- They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again.
Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions in an open mainstream venue.
looks like you are on number 2
Ye, I can't answer if you keep bombing me with arguments and stuff
you have not aswered any of the questions lol
When I did ansered with scientific knowledge you just tried the best to refute it
Well I had, you just st your opinion refuted it
what scientific knowledge???
About biology mayby?
Omg
Google scholar
yea that crap lol
There is a huge difference on googling on wikipedia and google scholar
what because it says scholar on it you think it knows better hahahahaha
Google scholar is a source for actual scientific knowledge
google is not a trustable source
Of course, it's only specialists works
- They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
- They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to the question.
- They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again.
Not one anti-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions in an open mainstream venue.
you dont know what scientific is
what is the scientific method???
Scientific methods constits of a series of criteria to acrueally get accurate knowledge
that is not the scientific method hahahahaha
this shows me alot about you now lol
you dont know shit do you
I said I am not an specialist on medicine
all the research you have presented can be refuted and is produced for money
About scientific method, it's hard to actually resume it
Even more in anothe rlanguage
Yours can be too
you dont even know the scientific methd this is pathetic o
Who guarantees that this guy in youtube are speaking 100% true
if you dont follow the scientific method then your science is pseudoscience
Who guarantees that Naturenews are speaking the truth
Well, those articles followed
that is fact
Also yeah, I am righton what I said
???
The scientific method is a series of criterias
with what??