Only in a democratic system

so you think they should just take it then and not fight the injustice?

sad

a weak outlook you have

No they should, but not outright with force

lol

I see that as unethical

well, your ethics are weak

Probably, but that’s what they are. I think it’s ethically wrong to make the first violent strike

any ethics that dont allow for self-defense are pacifistic and thus worthless

You don't believe in pre-emptive self defense?

That’s different, I support self defense.

you are saying that in sa they cant react to the threat

thats an example of self defense

What’s sa?

they may want to defend their property and livelihood

what's going on here

south africa?

Oooooh

What's going on in here I heard South Africa

South African land reform, heard of it?

eeeee

Yeah I have I didn’t know that’s what we were talking about

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-28/land-confiscations-loom-south-africa-rules-300000-gun-owners-turn-over-their

Tyranny of the majority

take farm and take gun so whitey can't fight back

``even though we outnumber whitey``

tfw you outnumber and outgun the SA whites but you're still scared they can put up a fight so you take their shit

chiang kai shek is a woke username

That's what your position is. @Griselda

Chinese Nationalists were pretty alright

they fought commies and no one really helped them(except Germany) until post ww2 when everyone finally realized the Soviets were fucking gay.

this discord channel is brought to you by viewers like you

thank you

my favorite thing

@campodin they should fight back, I’m not saying they shouldn’t. But I’m saying they likely won’t win. The SA gov is the bad guy clearly, so the farmers are right to fight back

is 1st world teenagers arguing for authoritarian ideologies

government should provide for the security of its citizens

@Alice Redacted my favorite thing is people jacking off to Oriental cartoons

And their freedom

@Griselda but hey majority rules, bitch. Fighting back is against democracy