Message from @Death Strike's Bat
Discord ID: 292038729734815744
Yes
Which is ridiculous
But you do, so I approve of your principled non-hypocrisy.
If you rape a child
You should die
painfully
I would kill the lawyer and family
Being labelled a criminal is a far lesser stigma for me than being someone who would let his child be raped and not take vengeance.
Of anyone who defended the rapist of my kid.
Yes, but it should be determined that the child was raped and that the person being killed is infact guilty
@Death Strike's Bat I would help you or hide you if you were on the run.
You want to excuse his actions? You die too.
I don't assume that someone who would wantonly commit murder is a good judge
I would actually assume they are an unstable person prone to violence
Ok, since it is getting this absurd, let's add a final condition: you WALK IN on the act of rape.
It's not absurd
I would kill him on the spot.
'wantonly'?
are you kidding?
It's not absurd to think that you should determine someone committed a crime before killing them
Nah
Which is the condition you're arguing against
you walk in on him
Don't spend money on it.
No appeals.
No mercy
Appeal is phonecall
shot that smug look off his face too
Automatically denied.
the state-run justice system is just as prone to error as mine and @Death Strike's Bat 's, with the added drawback of delay and lack of justice.
Nah I disagree
There's accountability
Which is the difference
There is oversight
Vigilante justice has no oversight other than other vigilantes and the extant justice system
are you a troll? 😉
@sampletext That was sly AF
How is it vigilante?
haha ikr?