@Noxar in a way as allowance of unskilled immigrants can be bad for us, but who’s to say that those immigrants won’t pick up skills along the way

it's demographic suicide, ethnic genocide

its irrelevant wheter they work or not

Yea I can see that

fdr was one of the best presidents

shutup subversive jew

shut up foreigner

muh 1965 was genocide

it's a decision made by the people's elected representatives

you look at modern polling and the vast majority still support immigrants

@agag implying thats a good thing

lmao

it's the way things are, stop trying to spin modern US immigration as some hostile elite not representing the people

because that's not what's happening at all

Ooo

Argument

@agag isn’t there an overall negative effect on not restricting immigration on merit

If immigration is **so good** for America tell me about California.

they are no more than 16% of the US population, but they appear in these google stuff equally or even more than any other race. How is that logical?

@PainSeeker5 I support merit based immigration, I'm not going to bother defending our current immigration system, but the idea that it's going to collapse our country is just baseless

@agag supporting immigration is zogbotted

https://www.spreaker.com/show/nordic-frontier
Simon Lindberg (the leader of the Nordic Resistance Movement) is on the nordic frontier answering questions right now

america should conquer canada

@Kierketard the Germans estimated the European Jewish population to be 10.3 million in 1937

http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/korherr.html

this is a report from Richard Korherr to Heinrich Himmler

note especially the number of Jews "passed through the camps in the General Government"

this is a euphemism

it was originally "Sonderbehandlung," special treatment, which was used as a euphemism for mass murder

@agag I'm not seeing anything on 6 million Jews being explicitly killed.

Am I missing something?

this is a document from 1943, you shouldn't expect that

and it only discusses up to the end of 1942

So what are you trying to convey in the broad scope of things?

well for one thing the 1929 estimate from Linfield is quite a bit lower than the German's own estimate

Mine is consistent with other estimates.

Again, if the loss of life shown between the two dates doesn't even exceed 6 million, how can you say 6 milion were explictly killed by Germany?

6 million is a maximum, most estimates fall somwhere between 5-6 million, so I don't say that

Hilberg gives 5.1 million

and this document doesn't include all the deaths in the east

and none of the ones in European Russia