Message from @Verm
Discord ID: 328777236754726912
it defends us from shitty governments
Hmmmm
it's appalling to me that in the US our so-called "free" market is regulated so much
it totally violates our founding principles
Suspicious.jpg
lol
You're both communists it's official
it's a nice idea but any implementation of it gives too much power to the government, again
Universal Healthcare works only if you have a proper infrastructure or don't need to travel far for your products, like a microstate. Compared to America, which opted to create state-based monopololies. These monopololies then force them to pay out the ass, because it's the government. Infinite money, boyyy.
@RabbiLeo I have not studied alternative economic theories, therefore I get to play ignorance.
@Manimalia ignorance is no excuse
Excuse me, what do you call a dictionary on drugs?
@Rez at Dorsia a mistake?
@RabbiLeo would you rather I pretend to know what I'm talking about?
High-Definition
Kek
It's best to learn, and keep on learning.
@Verm If health insurance is govt required, then cigarettes should be illegal. I don't want to put into a community fund which will be drained by degenerates.
Remind yourself that the existance of government health insurance gives power to the state. There's no reason they'd want to get rid of tobacco or other harmful substances, since that'd destroy the projected need for said healthcare.
The population must be kept tame and willing. Indoctrination is king, and the progressives know it all too well.
preach
If a state had eugenics as a core principle, then your statement would be wrong.
^
no state should have eugenics
WTF?
what?
am I wrong for not wanting the government to sterilize me?
Depends. If the state decides upon whom the eugenics are performed on, you'd be correct. - If it's by the population, and in limited measure in worst-case scenarios like most of europe currently, you'd be wrong.
The former however, is currently only applied by third world shitholes though.
Eugenics is the betterment of genes. I dont what the opposite term would be?
Huh.
I have no idea either.
look i'm willing to allow a sub-par gene pool if the alternative is letting the government sterilize people
keep the government away from my nuts
Start by improving the genepool then and sterilize yourself with a coat hanger and a waffle iron @RAF
Instead of performing eugenics, let the choice be on the people's part and promote pairings of high-intellect individuals. Do this for long enough and the gene pool, while not in utmost efficiency, will improve.
@Manimalia as gruesomely as you can imagine
i agree with redguard here]